Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528413›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2023

Segmentation and counting of wheat spike grains based on deep learning and textural feature.

Xin Xu, Qing Geng, Feng Gao, Du Xiong, Hongbo Qiao, Xinming Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xin XuCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Qing GengCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Feng GaoAgricultural College, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Du XiongCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Hongbo QiaoCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Xinming MaCollege of Information and Management Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. wheatdoctor@163.com.

Funding

Major statistical projects of the National Bureau of Statistics 2022ZX11Modern Agricultural Technology System Project of Henan Province S2010-01-G04Outstanding Science and Technology Innovation Talents Program of Henan Province 184200510008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrain count is crucial to wheat yield composition and estimating yield parameters. However, traditional manual counting methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This study developed an advanced deep learning technique for the segmentation counting model of wheat grains. This model has been rigorously tested on three distinct wheat varieties: 'Bainong 307', 'Xinmai 26', and 'Jimai 336', and it has achieved unprecedented predictive counting accuracy.

methodThe images of wheat ears were taken with a smartphone at the late stage of wheat grain filling. We used image processing technology to preprocess and normalize the images to 480*480 pixels. A CBAM-HRNet wheat grain segmentation counting deep learning model based on the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) was constructed by combining deep learning, migration learning, and attention mechanism. Image processing algorithms and wheat grain texture features were used to build a grain counting and predictive counting model for wheat grains.

resultsThe CBAM-HRNet model using the CBAM was the best for wheat grain segmentation. Its segmentation accuracy of 92.04%, the mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 85.21%, the category mean pixel accuracy (mPA) of 91.16%, and the recall rate of 91.16% demonstrate superior robustness compared to other models such as HRNet, PSPNet, DeeplabV3+ , and U-Net. Method I for spike count, which calculates twice the number of grains on one side of the spike to determine the total number of grains, demonstrates a coefficient of determination R

conclusionsImage segmentation algorithm of the CBAM-HRNet wheat spike grain is a powerful solution that uses the CBAM to segment wheat spike grains and obtain richer semantic information. This model can effectively address the challenges of small target image segmentation and under-fitting problems in training. Additionally, the spike grain counting model can quickly and accurately predict the grain count of wheat, providing algorithmic support for efficient and intelligent wheat yield estimation.

Indexed as

Deep learningGrain numberHRNetImage processingImage segmentationWheat ear

Identifiers

PMID37528413
PMCPMC10394929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.