ArticlePlant methods2023
Segmentation and counting of wheat spike grains based on deep learning and textural feature.
Article in Plant methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant counting: origins, development, and future paths.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Advanced deep learning vision transformer models for intelligent grain counting in agricultural data analytics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning approach for wheat variety identification using single-seed imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- SoyCountNet: a deep learning framework for counting and locating soybean seeds in field environment.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Study on automatic detection of wheat spike grain number based on deep learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- The Global Wheat Full Semantic Organ Segmentation (GWFSS) dataset.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Lightweight deep neural network for contour detection and extraction of wheat spikes in complex field environments.Plant methods · 2025Article
- GrainNet: efficient detection and counting of wheat grains based on an improved YOLOv7 modeling.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Automated recognition and segmentation of lung cancer cytological images based on deep learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing Wheat Spike Counting and Disease Detection Using a Probability Density Attention Mechanism in Deep Learning Models for Precision Agriculture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- FIDMT-GhostNet: a lightweight density estimation model for wheat ear counting.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Multi temporal multispectral UAV remote sensing allows for yield assessment across European wheat varieties already before flowering.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrain count is crucial to wheat yield composition and estimating yield parameters. However, traditional manual counting methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. This study developed an advanced deep learning technique for the segmentation counting model of wheat grains. This model has been rigorously tested on three distinct wheat varieties: 'Bainong 307', 'Xinmai 26', and 'Jimai 336', and it has achieved unprecedented predictive counting accuracy.
methodThe images of wheat ears were taken with a smartphone at the late stage of wheat grain filling. We used image processing technology to preprocess and normalize the images to 480*480 pixels. A CBAM-HRNet wheat grain segmentation counting deep learning model based on the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) was constructed by combining deep learning, migration learning, and attention mechanism. Image processing algorithms and wheat grain texture features were used to build a grain counting and predictive counting model for wheat grains.
resultsThe CBAM-HRNet model using the CBAM was the best for wheat grain segmentation. Its segmentation accuracy of 92.04%, the mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 85.21%, the category mean pixel accuracy (mPA) of 91.16%, and the recall rate of 91.16% demonstrate superior robustness compared to other models such as HRNet, PSPNet, DeeplabV3+ , and U-Net. Method I for spike count, which calculates twice the number of grains on one side of the spike to determine the total number of grains, demonstrates a coefficient of determination R
conclusionsImage segmentation algorithm of the CBAM-HRNet wheat spike grain is a powerful solution that uses the CBAM to segment wheat spike grains and obtain richer semantic information. This model can effectively address the challenges of small target image segmentation and under-fitting problems in training. Additionally, the spike grain counting model can quickly and accurately predict the grain count of wheat, providing algorithmic support for efficient and intelligent wheat yield estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.