Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528396›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2023

Prediction and optimization of indirect shoot regeneration of Passiflora caerulea using machine learning and optimization algorithms.

Marziyeh Jafari, Mohammad Hosein Daneshvar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Enhancing Withanolide Production in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marziyeh JafariDepartment of Horticultural Science, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 7144113131, Iran. jaafari.marziye2010@gmail.com.
Mohammad Hosein DaneshvarDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, 6341773637, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimization of indirect shoot regeneration protocols is one of the key prerequisites for the development of Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation and/or genome editing in Passiflora caerulea. Comprehensive knowledge of indirect shoot regeneration and optimized protocol can be obtained by the application of a combination of machine learning (ML) and optimization algorithms. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn the present investigation, the indirect shoot regeneration responses (i.e., de novo shoot regeneration rate, the number of de novo shoots, and length of de novo shoots) of P. caerulea were predicted based on different types and concentrations of PGRs (i.e., TDZ, BAP, PUT, KIN, and IBA) as well as callus types (i.e., callus derived from different explants including leaf, node, and internode) using generalized regression neural network (GRNN) and random forest (RF). Moreover, the developed models were integrated into the genetic algorithm (GA) to optimize the concentration of PGRs and callus types for maximizing indirect shoot regeneration responses. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the importance of each input variable on the studied parameters.

resultsThe results showed that both algorithms (RF and GRNN) had high predictive accuracy (R

conclusionsA combination of ML (GRNN and RF) and GA can display a forward-thinking aid to optimize and predict in vitro culture systems and consequentially cope with several challenges faced currently in Passiflora tissue culture.

Indexed as

PassifloraPlant Growth RegulatorsAlgorithmsMachine LearningPlant ShootsRegenerationPlant Growth RegulatorsArtificial intelligenceCallus typeIn vitro cultureMicropropagationModelingPassion fruitPlant growth regulator

Identifiers

PMID37528396
PMCPMC10394921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.