Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528301›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

An automatic texture feature analysis framework of renal tumor: surgical, pathological, and molecular evaluation based on multi-phase abdominal CT.

Huancheng Yang, Hanlin Liu, Jiashan Lin, Hongwei Xiao, Yiqi Guo, Hangru Mei, Qiuxia Ding, Yangguang Yuan, Xiaohui Lai, Kai Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huancheng Yang *Luohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Hanlin Liu *Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Jiashan LinLuohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Hongwei XiaoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yiqi GuoLuohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China.
Hangru MeiDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Qiuxia DingDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Yangguang YuanDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Xiaohui LaiDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Kai WuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen, 518000, China. wukai1990@hotmail.com.
Song WuLuohu Clinical Institute, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515000, China. wusong@szu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3504-1630
Shenzhen University · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2019A1515110038Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program 202208183000146Shenzhen Science and Technology Program RCJC20200714114557005The National Natural Science Foundation Fund of China 61931024The Special Funds for Strategic Emerging Industries Development in Shenzhen 20180309163446298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether the texture feature analysis of multi-phase abdominal CT can provide a robust prediction of benign and malignant, histological subtype, pathological stage, nephrectomy risk, pathological grade, and Ki67 index in renal tumor.

methodsA total of 1051 participants with renal tumor were split into the internal cohort (850 patients from four different hospitals) and the external testing cohort (201 patients from another local hospital). The proposed framework comprised a 3D-kidney and tumor segmentation model by 3D-UNet, a feature extractor for the regions of interest based on radiomics and image dimension reduction, and the six classifiers by XGBoost. A quantitative model interpretation method called SHAP was used to explore the contribution of each feature.

resultsThe proposed multi-phase abdominal CT model provides robust prediction for benign and malignant, histological subtype, pathological stage, nephrectomy risk, pathological grade, and Ki67 index in the internal validation set, with the AUROC values of 0.88 ± 0.1, 0.90 ± 0.1, 0.91 ± 0.1, 0.89 ± 0.1, 0.84 ± 0.1, and 0.88 ± 0.1, respectively. The external testing set also showed impressive results, with AUROC values of 0.83 ± 0.1, 0.83 ± 0.1, 0.85 ± 0.1, 0.81 ± 0.1, 0.79 ± 0.1, and 0.81 ± 0.1, respectively. The radiomics feature including the first-order statistics, the tumor size-related morphology, and the shape-related tumor features contributed most to the model predictions.

conclusionsAutomatic texture feature analysis of abdominal multi-phase CT provides reliable predictions for multi-tasks, suggesting the potential usage of clinical application. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The automatic texture feature analysis framework, based on multi-phase abdominal CT, provides robust and reliable predictions for multi-tasks. These valuable insights can serve as a guiding tool for clinical diagnosis and treatment, making medical imaging an essential component in the process. KEY POINTS: • The automatic texture feature analysis framework based on multi-phase abdominal CT can provide more accurate prediction of benign and malignant, histological subtype, pathological stage, nephrectomy risk, pathological grade, and Ki67 index in renal tumor. • The quantitative decomposition of the prediction model was conducted to explore the contribution of the extracted feature. • The study involving 1051 patients from 5 medical centers, along with a heterogeneous external data testing strategy, can be seamlessly transferred to various tasks involving new datasets.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsHumansKi-67 AntigenRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedKi-67 AntigenKidney neoplasmsMachine learningPathologyTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID37528301
OpenAlexW4385462856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.