Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528277›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.

William Narhi-Martinez, Blaire Dube, Jiageng Chen, Andrew B Leber, Julie D Golomb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William Narhi-MartinezDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. narhi-martinez.1@osu.edu.
Blaire DubeDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Jiageng ChenDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Andrew B LeberDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Julie D GolombDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3489-0702
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Neural and perceptual mechanisms of spatial stability across eye movementsR01EY025648 · NEI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie D Golomb · 2015 to 2026
$4.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are often bombarded with salient stimuli that capture our attention and distract us from our current goals. Decades of research have shown the robust detrimental impacts of salient distractors on search performance and, of late, in leading to altered feature perception. These feature errors can be quite extreme, and thus, undesirable. In search tasks, salient distractors can be suppressed if they appear more frequently in one location, and this learned spatial suppression can lead to reductions in the cost of distraction as measured by reaction time slowing. Can learned spatial suppression also protect against visual feature errors? To investigate this question, participants were cued to report one of four briefly presented colored squares on a color wheel. On two-thirds of trials, a salient distractor appeared around one of the nontarget squares, appearing more frequently in one location over the course of the experiment. Participants' responses were fit to a model estimating performance parameters and compared across conditions. Our results showed that general performance (guessing and precision) improved when the salient distractor appeared in a likely location relative to elsewhere. Critically, feature swap errors (probability of misreporting the color at the salient distractor's location) were also significantly reduced when the distractor appeared in a likely location, suggesting that learned spatial suppression of a salient distractor helps protect the processing of target features. This study provides evidence that, in addition to helping us avoid salient distractors, suppression likely plays a larger role in helping to prevent distracting information from being encoded.

Indexed as

AttentionLearningCuesHumansProbabilityReaction Timeattentional capture, distractor suppression, feature interference, experience-driven attention

Identifiers

PMID37528277
PMCPMC11163954
OpenAlexW4385453927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.