ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2023
Building a new reasonable atomic theory.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Building a new reasonable molecular theoryJournal of molecular modeling · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextThis article is an initiation to build reasonable atomic/molecular theory to study chemicals utilized in different sectors of science including chemistry, biology, and medicine as well as the material science. It is all about opening new pathways and method-developments which need to be simple, reasonable, rational, and applicable to all chemicals and be closely consistent with the experimental data and real world. Hence, the success may simplify the process and eliminate the need to sophisticated software and heavy computations. The article first reviews the current classical atomic theory, and discusses some of its flaws. Then, it suggests a more reasonable approach through several presented simple formulas which would generate results consistent with the experimental data. Finally, the article goes through some examples, cases, and details to present the differences between the new suggested approach and the current classical atomic theory. Building new pathways would help not only with the ongoing scientific achievements but it would also help in classrooms and the education of next future generations.
methodsAll of the calculations and figures presented in this article are done by simple calculators and the use of Microsoft software including excel spreadsheet. The presented atomic theory does not need any sophisticated software and/or heavy computations. If desired, one can also use a simple personal programing technique to generate the desired results. So the key is in better understanding of the subjects and not in development of complicated computational tools and theoretical techniques. This article did not use any of the usual ab initio or DFT, or basis sets, or force field molecular-dynamics techniques. The focus of this article is mainly atomic theory which will expand to molecular theory in future articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37528275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.