Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37527013›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

SETD2 Loss and ATR Inhibition Synergize to Promote cGAS Signaling and Immunotherapy Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Xian-De Liu, Yan-Ting Zhang, Daniel J McGrail, Xuesong Zhang, Truong Lam, Anh Hoang, Elshad Hasanov, Ganiraju Manyam, Christine B Peterson, Haifeng Zhu and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Targeting ATR in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xian-De Liu *Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-0458
Yan-Ting Zhang *Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8647-9021
Daniel J McGrailCenter for Immunotherapy and Precision Immuno-Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-6069
Xuesong ZhangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0006-8400-9679
Truong LamDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-8398
Anh HoangDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0008-2699-4337
Elshad HasanovDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-7195-0842
Ganiraju ManyamDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-6006-8961
Christine B PetersonDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3316-0468
Haifeng ZhuDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-7315-4105
Shwetha V KumarDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9540-2288
Rehan AkbaniDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-2686-7721
Patrick G PilieDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-8759-0020
Nizar M TannirDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-5559-8060
Guang PengDepartment of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-1497
Eric JonaschDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-0943-2806
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
A Genome Data Analysis Center Focused on Batch Effect Analysis and Data IntegrationU24CA264006 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AKBANI, REHAN, WEINSTEIN, JOHN N · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NovaSeq6000S10OD024977 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUFF, VICKI · 2018 to 2018
$995k
Determining the Immunological Consequences of DNA Replication Stress Response Defects in Renal Cells Carcinoma to Improve Immunotherapy OutcomesR00CA240689 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MCGRAIL, DANIEL JAMES · 2022 to 2024
$747k
Functional Proteomics by Reverse Phase Protein Array in CancerR50CA221675 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LU, YILING · 2017 to 2021
$726k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R00 CA240689NCI NIH HHS R50 CA221675NCI NIH HHS U24 CA264006NIH HHS S10 OD024977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) demonstrates durable clinical benefits in a minority of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to identify the molecular features that determine the response and develop approaches to enhance it. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe investigated the effects of SET domain-containing protein 2 (SETD2) loss on the DNA damage response pathway, the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, the tumor immune microenvironment, and the response to ataxia telangiectasia and rad3-related (ATR) and checkpoint inhibition in RCC.

resultsATR inhibition activated the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS)-interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3)-dependent cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, resulting in the concurrent expression of inflammatory cytokines and immune checkpoints. Among the common RCC genotypes, SETD2 loss is associated with preferential ATR activation and sensitizes cells to ATR inhibition. SETD2 knockdown promoted the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway in response to ATR inhibition. Treatment with the ATR inhibitor VE822 concurrently upregulated immune cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in Setd2 knockdown Renca tumors, providing a rationale for ATR inhibition plus ICB combination therapy. Setd2-deficient Renca tumors demonstrated greater vulnerability to ICB monotherapy or combination therapy with VE822 than Setd2-proficient tumors. Moreover, SETD2 mutations were associated with a higher response rate and prolonged overall survival in patients with ICB-treated RCC but not in patients with non-ICB-treated RCC.

conclusionsSETD2 loss and ATR inhibition synergize to promote cGAS signaling and enhance immune cell infiltration, providing a mechanistic rationale for the combination of ATR and checkpoint inhibition in patients with RCC with SETD2 mutations.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsCell Line, TumorDNADNA DamageHumansImmunotherapyNucleotidyltransferasesTumor MicroenvironmentAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanDNANucleotidyltransferases

Identifiers

PMID37527013
PMCPMC10592192
OpenAlexW4385454100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.