Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37526934›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2023

Effect of Dural-Puncture Epidural vs Standard Epidural for Epidural Extension on Onset Time of Surgical Anesthesia in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Nadir Sharawi, Matthew Williams, Waseem Athar, Caroline Martinello, Kyle Stoner, Cameron Taylor, Nan Guo, Pervez Sultan, Jill M Mhyre

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03915574 nacompletednot on this map

Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized, Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2019 to 2023Enrolled280ConditionsPain LevelsArms25G Dural Puncture Epidural, Standard Epidural
NCT07295080 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural and Standard Epidural Anesthesia Techniques in Elective Cesarean Deliveries

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnkara City Hospital BilkentRan2026 to 2026Enrolled91ConditionsRegional Anaesthesia in Cesarean OperationsArmsDural puncture epidural (DPE) anaesthesia, standart epidural anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effective volume of ropivacaine 0.1% plus sufentanil 0.3 μg·mLCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A standardized algorithm for assessing labor epidural analgesia.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nadir SharawiDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Matthew WilliamsDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Waseem AtharDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Caroline MartinelloDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Kyle StonerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
Cameron TaylorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Nan GuoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Pervez SultanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Jill M MhyreDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USStanford University · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Dural-puncture epidural (DPE) and standard epidural are common modes of neuraxial labor analgesia. Little is known about conversion of DPE-initiated labor analgesia to surgical anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Objective: To determine whether DPE provides a faster onset and better-quality block compared with the standard epidural technique for cesarean delivery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted between April 2019 and October 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital (University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences). Participants included women aged 18 years and older undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery with a singleton pregnancy. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive DPE or standard epidural in the labor and delivery room. A T10 sensory block was achieved and maintained using a low concentration of bupivacaine with fentanyl through the epidural catheter until the time of surgery. Epidural extension anesthesia was initiated in the operating room. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the time taken from chloroprocaine administration to surgical anesthesia (T6 sensory block). The secondary outcome was the quality of epidural anesthesia, as defined by a composite of the following factors: (1) failure to achieve a T10 bilateral block preoperatively in the delivery room, (2) failure to achieve a surgical block at T6 within 15 minutes of chloroprocaine administration, (3) requirement for intraoperative analgesia, (4) repeat neuraxial procedure, and (5) conversion to general anesthesia. Results: Among 140 women (mean [SD] age, 30.1 [5.2] years), 70 were randomized to the DPE group, and 70 were randomized to the standard epidural group. The DPE group had a faster onset time to surgical anesthesia compared with the standard epidural group (median [IQR], 422 [290-546] seconds vs 655 [437-926] seconds; median [IQR] difference, 233 [104-369] seconds). The composite rates of lower quality anesthesia were 15.7% (11 of 70 women) in the DPE group and 36.3% (24 of 66 women) in the standard epidural group (odds ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.14-0.74; P = .007). Conclusions and Relevance: Anesthesia initiated following a DPE technique resulted in faster onset and improved block quality during epidural extension compared with initiation with a standard epidural technique. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in the setting of intrapartum cesarean delivery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03915574.

Indexed as

Analgesia, ObstetricalAnesthesia, EpiduralLabor, ObstetricAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyProcainePunctureschloroprocaineProcaine

Identifiers

PMID37526934
PMCPMC10394571
OpenAlexW4385441948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.