Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37526926›Full record

ArticleMilitary psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association2024

Leadership perspectives on facilitators and barriers to sustaining evidence-based prevention interventions in the United States Military.

Alison L Drew, Kimberly A Rhoades, Amy M Smith Slep, Richard E Heyman, Huidi Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Factors influencing the implementation of integrated prevention programming in the United States military: Qualitative perspectives from recipients, implementers, and leaders.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alison L DrewFamily Translations Research Group, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3590-1269
Kimberly A RhoadesFamily Translations Research Group, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2549-7602
Amy M Smith SlepFamily Translations Research Group, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6321-1740
Richard E HeymanFamily Translations Research Group, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5365-0037
Huidi YangFamily Translations Research Group, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-3040-1385

Funding

US Army Medical Research and Development Command W81XWH-20-0582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) aims to prevent suicide, harassment, sexual assault, and partner and child maltreatment by implementing evidence-based behavioral health interventions (EBIs). However, sustaining EBI implementation over time and with fidelity to result in meaningful impacts is a tremendous challenge. We interviewed 35 military leaders in positions to observe, and possibly hinder, the erosions of EBI implementations to learn what distinguishes EBIs that sustain in the military from those that fade away. Thematic analysis identified barriers and supports to EBI sustainment consistent with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, reflecting the domains: outer setting, inner setting, individuals, and innovation. Participants described how factors at different levels of the social ecology interact with each other and emphasized how aspects of military culture (e.g., hierarchical structure, frequent moves, mission focus) can both support and challenge implementing and sustaining behavioral-health EBIs. EBI implementation in the military differs from most civilian settings in that service member participation in certain preventative programs is mandated. The results indicate how policy and practice can strengthen sustained EBI implementation to reduce harm and support service members.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeLeadershipMilitary PersonnelAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesEvidence-based interventionsimplementation sciencemilitarypreventionsustainment

Identifiers

PMID37526926
PMCPMC11622577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.