ArticleMaternal and child health journal2023
Small-for-Gestational-Age and Vocabulary and Achievement Test Scores at Age 9 Among Children Born at Term in a Contemporary U.S. Sample.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lifelong cognitive and motor outcomes after being born small for gestational age or with fetal growth restriction.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Behavioral and Cognitive Assessment in a Cohort of Term Small-for-Gestational-Age Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionChildren that are small-for-gestational-age (SGA) at birth are at an increased risk for cognitive impairment, even if born at term (37-41 weeks). This study examined associations between sex-specific SGA and vocabulary and achievement tests in 9 year old children born at term using a contemporary population-based US sample.
methodsA secondary data analysis was conducted on a sample of 2144 children born at term in 1998-2000 who participated in a US birth cohort study that oversampled non-marital births, which in the U.S. are associated with socioeconomic disadvantage and racial minority status. Vocabulary and achievement tests were administered to participants at age 9. Unadjusted and adjusted Ordinary Least Squares and logistic regression models of associations between SGA and test scores were estimated.
resultsSex-specific SGA was associated with 2-5 point lower test scores and 1-2 times the odds of scores less than 85 (> 1 SD below the national mean) across most outcomes. In adjusted models, measures of SGA were associated with low scores on the Woodcock-Johnson Applied Problems test (OR 2.257; 95% CI 1.434, 3.551) and the Woodcock-Johnson Passage Comprehension test (OR 1.554; 95% CI 1.132, 2.134).
conclusionThe findings validate previous studies of SGA at term and cognitive outcomes and provide further evidence using a contemporary high-risk population-based US sample. The findings suggest that SGA children born at term should be recruited for early interventions to promote improved cognitive functioning in school.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.