Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37526669›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

Combined prenatal US and post-mortem fetal MRI: can they replace conventional autopsy for fetal body abnormalities?

Marine Moeremans, Fred E Avni, Nicky d'Haene, Ngoc My Lam, Thierry Metens, Aurélie D'Hondt

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Establish Standardized Pathological and Genetic Examinations to Reduce the Incidence of Stillbirth].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marine MoeremansDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), 1160, Brussels, Belgium. marine.moeremans@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4308-151X
Fred E AvniDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
Nicky d'HaeneDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Ngoc My LamDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Thierry MetensDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Aurélie D'HondtDepartment of Radiology, Hôpital Delta (CHIREC), 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
Centre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe acceptance of conventional autopsy (CA), the gold standard method for investigating fetal death, often remains problematic. Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (PMMRI) is increasingly advocated, particularly for neurologic malformations. However, PMMRI performances to diagnose non-neurologic malformations remain unclear. We aim to clarify whether a full body CA remains needed after prenatal ultrasound (US) and PMMRI in assessing non-neurologic fetal malformations.

methodsIn this retrospective IRB-approved study, during a 6-year period, all fetuses who underwent PMMRI, prenatal US, and full body CA were included. Body abnormalities were identified in US, PMMRI, and CA reports. US and PMMRI images were all reviewed. All abnormalities were graded as major (2 points) or minor (1 point). Each technique (US, PMMRI, CA) was given a score by adding all grading points. In each fetus, results were compared for both separate and combined US and PMMRI to CA. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for detecting major abnormalities.

resultsFifty fetuses were included. The score of CA, US, and PMMRI was respectively 53, 37, and 46. Compared with US-PMMRI, CA added information in 2 cases (4%) with major abnormalities and 7 cases (14%) with minor abnormalities. PMMRI and US were concordant in 36/50 (72%) fetuses. Separate US/PMMRI sensitivities and specificities for detecting major body malformations respectively were 80%/80% and 100%/94%. Combined US-PMMRI had a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 94%. Two cardiac malformations (2/6) were only described by CA.

conclusionsAfter prenatal US and PMMRI, few additional fetal body malformations are discovered with CA. Nevertheless, fetal heart autopsy remains mandatory. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A cardiac conventional autopsy complemented by prenatal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI allows to detect all major fetal body abnormalities. With this efficient and much less invasive approach, a higher acceptance rate of fetal autopsy can be expected. KEY POINTS: • Excepting cardiac malformations, most major fetal body malformations can reliably be identified by prenatal US combined with post-mortem MRI. • In the post-mortem diagnosis of fetal body malformations, a conventional autopsy limited to the fetal heart might replace a full body autopsy after a well-conducted prenatal US and post-mortem MRI.

Indexed as

Fetal DeathFetusAutopsyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, PrenatalAbnormalities, fetusesAutopsyFetal imagingMRIUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID37526669
OpenAlexW4385441705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.