ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2023
Assessment of the stability of antimicrobials and resistance genes during short- and long-term storage condition: accounting for uncertainties in bioanalytical workflows.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating packaged ice safety using culture-based and metagenomic methods.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2026Article
- Preventive effect of ulinastatin on postoperative cognitive dysfunction through modulation of the gut microbiome: evidence from short-chain fatty acids.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2026Article
- Snowmaking Infrastructure: A Selective Barrier or Potential Vector for Antibiotic Residues and Resistance Determinants in Mountain Catchments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Culture, qPCR, and genome-based surveillance ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Presence of antibiotics in children's urine: a silent risk beyond drinking water.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Unravelling complexities in antimicrobial agent-microbe interactions in the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires robust analytical workflows accounting for all uncertainties. Temporal storage of wastewater samples under refrigerated or frozen conditions prior to chemical and biological analysis is widely used to facilitate laboratory routine but may affect stability of analytes over time. Yet, little knowledge exists regarding stability of biological and chemical determinants in environmental samples, which hampers validity of research outputs. This study examines, for the first time, the stability of 32 antimicrobials (AAs) including commonly used classes of antibiotics and their representative metabolites and variation of 5 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) (ermB, sul1, tetW, blaCTX-M, qnrS), as well as intI1 and 16S rRNA genes in a reference wastewater sample stored under freezing condition for up to 1 year. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and quantitative PCR (qPCR) techniques were adopted to measure concentration of AAs and ARGs, respectively. Results suggested that parent compounds are less affected by freezing storage compared to the metabolites. β-Lactams, clindamycin, and N-desmethyl clindamycin are the most-affected compounds which were poorly recovered (34-67%) from the starting concentration. By contrast, sulfonamides, macrolides, quinolones, and azoles are generally stable under freezing condition. No consistent differences were observed in gene copies between fresh and frozen samples, and ermB and tetW showed the highest variabilities at 30% under freezing condition. Overall, this study adds to the current knowledge on environmental AMR monitoring and emphasises the need for standardised protocols for AMR monitoring in the wastewater samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.