ArticleeLife2023
How inhibitory and excitatory inputs gate output of the inferior olive.
Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topographical Relationship in the Mesodiencephalic Projection to the Inferior Olive Linked With Cerebellar Hemispheric Lobules in Mice.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2026Article
- Compensatory and Dynamic Cerebellar Responses to Striatal Lesions in Experimental Parkinsonism.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- A transient feature of the inferior olive supports the development of cerebellar internal models.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Anatomical and functional examination of superior colliculus projections to the inferior olivary in mice.Brain structure & function · 2025Article
- Contextual effects during sensorimotor adaptation are an emergent property of population coding in a cerebellar-inspired model.Science advances · 2025Article
- Stage-dependent cerebrocerebellar communication during sensorimotor processing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Control of action potential afterdepolarizations in the inferior olive by inactivating A-type currents through KThe Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Homeostatic bidirectional plasticity in upbound and downbound micromodules in a model of the olivocerebellar loop.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Multifaceted Mesodiencephalic Triangles: Insights into Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration and Oculopalatal Tremor Pathophysiology.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Review
- Terra Incognita - Contributions of the Olivo-Cerebellar System to Autism Spectrum Disorder.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Review
- The cerebellum modulates thirst.Nature neuroscience · 2024Article
- A cerebellar population coding model for sensorimotor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Switching neuron contributions to second network activity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The inferior olive provides the climbing fibers to Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex, where they elicit all-or-none complex spikes and control major forms of plasticity. Given their important role in both short-term and long-term coordination of cerebellum-dependent behaviors, it is paramount to understand the factors that determine the output of olivary neurons. Here, we use mouse models to investigate how the inhibitory and excitatory inputs to the olivary neurons interact with each other, generating spiking patterns of olivary neurons that align with their intrinsic oscillations. Using dual color optogenetic stimulation and whole-cell recordings, we demonstrate how intervals between the inhibitory input from the cerebellar nuclei and excitatory input from the mesodiencephalic junction affect phase and gain of the olivary output at both the sub- and suprathreshold level. When the excitatory input is activated shortly (~50 ms) after the inhibitory input, the phase of the intrinsic oscillations becomes remarkably unstable and the excitatory input can hardly generate any olivary spike. Instead, when the excitatory input is activated one cycle (~150 ms) after the inhibitory input, the excitatory input can optimally drive olivary spiking, riding on top of the first cycle of the subthreshold oscillations that have been powerfully reset by the preceding inhibitory input. Simulations of a large-scale network model of the inferior olive highlight to what extent the synaptic interactions penetrate in the neuropil, generating quasi-oscillatory spiking patterns in large parts of the olivary subnuclei, the size of which also depends on the relative timing of the inhibitory and excitatory inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.