ArticleTransgender health2023
Providers' Perspectives on Decision-Making About Care for Transgender Youth.
Article in Transgender health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Care Provider Perspectives on Shared Decision Making With Parents and Adolescents.Clinical pediatrics · 2025Article
- Equitable aging in health framework: a multi-systems and multilevel approach to health challenges and supports for transgender older adults.Innovation in aging · 2025Article
- Capacity to consent: a scoping review of youth decision-making capacity for gender-affirming care.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) youth face health care decisions that are complicated by both social and medical aspects of gender care. Little is known about how providers support decision-making in this context or the gaps they perceive in decision support. Objective: To explore health care providers' perspectives on the decision-making processes in youth gender care. Methods: We interviewed health care providers ( Results: From providers' perspectives, they serve as "guides" to families through a challenging decision-making process. Youth arrive educated and eager to begin treatment, but caregivers are more hesitant. Providers lack data to address parents' concerns, and struggle to support families through interpersonal conflict. All providers recognized a need to improve decision support for families. Conclusions: Providers described decision-making in this context as a multistep process where interpersonal conflict and limited data slow progress. Practice Implications: There is ample opportunity to leverage insights from adult and pediatric medical decision-making research to improve decision support for providers, TGD youth, and families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.