Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525827›Full record

ArticleComputer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision2022

Minkyu Jeon, Hyeonjin Park, Hyunwoo J Kim, Michael Morley, Hyunghoon Cho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer vision - ECCV ... : ... European Conference on Computer Vision : proceedings. European Conference on Computer Vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Applications of generative adversarial networks in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of ophthalmic diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  3. Privacy-Enhancing Technologies in Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Minkyu JeonBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Hyeonjin ParkNAVER CLOVA, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyunwoo J KimKorea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Michael MorleyHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hyunghoon ChoBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Computational Methods for Enhancing Privacy in Biomedical Data SharingDP5OD029574 · OD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, HYUNGHOON · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
NIH HHS DP5 OD029574
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of modern machine learning to retinal image analyses offers valuable insights into a broad range of human health conditions beyond ophthalmic diseases. Additionally, data sharing is key to fully realizing the potential of machine learning models by providing a rich and diverse collection of training data. However, the personallyidentifying nature of retinal images, encompassing the unique vascular structure of each individual, often prevents this data from being shared openly. While prior works have explored image de-identification strategies based on synthetic averaging of images in other domains (e.g. facial images), existing techniques face difficulty in preserving both privacy and clinical utility in retinal images, as we demonstrate in our work. We therefore introduce

Indexed as

fundus imaginggenerative adversarial networksk-anonymityMedical image privacystyle transfersynthetic data generation

Identifiers

PMID37525827
PMCPMC10388376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.