ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Sensor Technology in Fracture Healing.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Fracture healing: from molecular and cellular mechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- A finite element study for tibial fractures: analyze the biomechanical condition of the tibial fracture area to provide guidance for subsequent treatment.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Sensor-integrated hip and knee prostheses: advances, challenges, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- The predictive value of stress-induced hyperglycemia parameters for delayed healing after tibial fracture post-surgery.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Adoption of robotics in arthroplasty- a survey of perceptions, utilization and challenges with technology amongst Indian surgeons.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: SMART sensor technology may provide the solution to bridge the gap between the current radiographic determination of fracture healing and clinical assessment. The displacement and rigidity between the fracture ends can be accurately measured using strain gauges. Progressively increasing stiffness is a sign of fracture consolidation which can be monitored using sensors. The design of standard orthopaedic implants can remain the same and needs no major modifications as the sensor can be mounted onto the implant without occupying much space. Data regarding various fracture morphologies and their strain levels throughout the fracture healing process may help develop AI algorithms that can subsequently be used to optimise implant design/materials. Materials and Methods: The literature search was performed in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for reviewing and evaluating the published scientific data regarding sensor technology in fracture healing. Results and Interpretation: SMART sensor technology comes with a variety of uses such as determining fracture healing progress, predicting early implant failure, and determining fractures liable for non-union to exemplify a few. The main limitations are that it is still in its inception and needs extensive refinement before it becomes widely and routinely used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, with continuous advances in microprocessor technology, research designs, and additive manufacturing, the utilisation and application of SMART implants in the field of trauma and orthopaedic surgery are constantly growing. Conclusion: Mass production of such SMART implants will reduce overall production costs and see its use in routine clinical practice in the future and is likely to make a significant contribution in the next industrial revolution termed 'Industry 5.0' which aims at personalised patient-specific implants and devices. SMART sensor technology may, therefore, herald a new era in the field of orthopaedic trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.