Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525713›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a persistent problem.

Chesney Siems, Rishav Aggarwal, Andrew Shaffer, Ranjit John

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Right ventricular failure after LVAD support: A challenging case of bridge to heart transplantation in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Current issues of destination therapy in Japan: to achieve 5-year or even longer survival.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chesney SiemsDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 207, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Rishav AggarwalDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 207, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Andrew ShafferDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 207, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.
Ranjit JohnDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 207, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an option for bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Right heart failure (RHF) remains a complication after LVAD implantation that portends high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in LVAD technology. Definitions of RHF vary, but generally include the need for inotropic or pulmonary vasodilator support, or potential right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support. This review covers the complex pathophysiology of RHF related to underlying myocardial dysfunction, interventricular dependence, and RV afterload, as well as treatment strategies to curtail this challenging problem.

Indexed as

Adult cardiacLeft ventricular assist deviceMechanical circulatory supportRight heart failure

Identifiers

PMID37525713
PMCPMC10387018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.