Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525650›Full record

ArticleBulletin of emergency and trauma2023

Comparing the Performance of Emergency Department Personnel and Patients' Preferences in Breaking Bad News.

Mohammad Gholami, Sina Valiee, Naser Kamyari, Salam Vatandost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of emergency and trauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad GholamiStudent Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Sina ValieeClinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Naser KamyariDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran.
Salam VatandostClinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Breaking bad news (BBN) is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery that can have significant implications for patients' outcomes. Inadequate and inappropriate delivery of bad news can result in detrimental psychological and emotional effects. This study aimed to compare the performance of emergency department (ED) personnel and patients' preferences in BBN. Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was conducted in 2022, and 135 patients who were admitted to the ED were included using quota sampling. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, a researcher-made questionnaire, and a standard questionnaire on attitudes toward the methods of BBN in the ED. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16), and a Results: The results showed that the majority of patients (69.6%) received bad news from nurses. Based on the conditions mentioned in the standard questionnaire, the overall performance of personnel was 6.08±4.22 out of 19, while the overall attitude score (59.66±7.66 out of 76) revealed patients' high tendency to receive bad news. There was a statistically significant difference between the total score of personnel performances and the total score of patients' attitudes ( Conclusion: The performance of ED personnel concerning patients' attitudes toward the method of BBN in the emergency department was not optimal. Therefore, it is recommended to implement appropriate training programs for medical professionals, especially physicians, and nurses, to enhance their communication skills and reduce the detrimental effects of inappropriate delivery of bad news in medical settings.

Indexed as

AttitudeBreaking Bad NewsEmergency DepartmentEmployee PerformancePatient

Identifiers

PMID37525650
PMCPMC10387337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.