Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525507›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2023

DCAMCP: A deep learning model based on capsule network and attention mechanism for molecular carcinogenicity prediction.

Zhe Chen, Li Zhang, Jianqiang Sun, Rui Meng, Shuaidong Yin, Qi Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Machine Learning-Enabled Drug-Induced Toxicity Prediction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhe ChenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.
Li ZhangSchool of Life Science, Liaoning University, Shenyang, China.
Jianqiang SunSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Linyi University, Linyi, China.
Rui MengSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, China.
Shuaidong YinSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, China.
Qi ZhaoSchool of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-1864

Funding

Foundation of Education Department of Liaoning Province LJKZ0280National Natural Science Foundation of China 11805091National Natural Science Foundation of China 82003655Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province 2023-MS-288Shenyang Science and Technology Talent Project RC210216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The carcinogenicity of drugs can have a serious impact on human health, so carcinogenicity testing of new compounds is very necessary before being put on the market. Currently, many methods have been used to predict the carcinogenicity of compounds. However, most methods have limited predictive power and there is still much room for improvement. In this study, we construct a deep learning model based on capsule network and attention mechanism named DCAMCP to discriminate between carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic compounds. We train the DCAMCP on a dataset containing 1564 different compounds through their molecular fingerprints and molecular graph features. The trained model is validated by fivefold cross-validation and external validation. DCAMCP achieves an average accuracy (ACC) of 0.718 ± 0.009, sensitivity (SE) of 0.721 ± 0.006, specificity (SP) of 0.715 ± 0.014 and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.793 ± 0.012. Meanwhile, comparable results can be achieved on an external validation dataset containing 100 compounds, with an ACC of 0.750, SE of 0.778, SP of 0.727 and AUC of 0.811, which demonstrate the reliability of DCAMCP. The results indicate that our model has made progress in cancer risk assessment and could be used as an efficient tool in drug design.

Indexed as

CarcinogensDeep LearningHumansROC CurveCarcinogenscapsule networkcarcinogenicitycomputational toxicologydeep learninggraph attention network

Identifiers

PMID37525507
PMCPMC10568665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.