ArticleBiophysical journal2023
Enhancing robustness, precision, and speed of traction force microscopy with machine learning.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidance for 3D traction force microscopy today and in the next decade.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Materials and measurement in mechanobiology.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Review
- Should Artificial Intelligence Play a Durable Role in Biomedical Research and Practice?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traction patterns of adherent cells provide important information on their interaction with the environment, cell migration, or tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Traction force microscopy is a method aimed at revealing these traction patterns for adherent cells on engineered substrates with known constitutive elastic properties from deformation information obtained from substrate images. Conventionally, the substrate deformation information is processed by numerical algorithms of varying complexity to give the corresponding traction field via solution of an ill-posed inverse elastic problem. We explore the capabilities of a deep convolutional neural network as a computationally more efficient and robust approach to solve this inversion problem. We develop a general purpose training process based on collections of circular force patches as synthetic training data, which can be subjected to different noise levels for additional robustness. The performance and the robustness of our approach against noise is systematically characterized for synthetic data, artificial cell models, and real cell images, which are subjected to different noise levels. A comparison with state-of-the-art Bayesian Fourier transform traction cytometry reveals the precision, robustness, and speed improvements achieved by our approach, leading to an acceleration of traction force microscopy methods in practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.