Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525294›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2023

A symbiotic footprint in the plant root microbiome.

Kyle Hartman, Marc W Schmid, Natacha Bodenhausen, S Franz Bender, Alain Y Valzano-Held, Klaus Schlaeppi, Marcel G A van der Heijden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. TwoInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kyle HartmanDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland.
Marc W SchmidMWSchmid GmbH, Glarus, 8750, Switzerland.
Natacha BodenhausenDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland.
S Franz BenderDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland.
Alain Y Valzano-HeldDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland.
Klaus SchlaeppiDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland. klaus.schlaeppi@unibas.ch.
Marcel G A van der HeijdenDepartment of Agroecology and Environment, Plant Soil Interactions, Reckenholzstrasse 191, Agroscope, Zürich, 8046, Switzerland. marcel.vanderheijden@agroscope.admin.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major aim in plant microbiome research is determining the drivers of plant-associated microbial communities. While soil characteristics and host plant identity present key drivers of root microbiome composition, it is still unresolved whether the presence or absence of important plant root symbionts also determines overall microbiome composition. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and N-fixing rhizobia bacteria are widespread, beneficial root symbionts that significantly enhance plant nutrition, plant health, and root structure. Thus, we hypothesized that symbiont types define the root microbiome structure.

resultsWe grew 17 plant species from five families differing in their symbiotic associations (no symbioses, AMF only, rhizobia only, or AMF and rhizobia) in a greenhouse and used bacterial and fungal amplicon sequencing to characterize their root microbiomes. Although plant phylogeny and species identity were the most important factors determining root microbiome composition, we discovered that the type of symbioses also presented a significant driver of diversity and community composition. We found consistent responses of bacterial phyla, including members of the Acidobacteria, Chlamydiae, Firmicutes, and Verrucomicrobia, to the presence or absence of AMF and rhizobia and identified communities of OTUs specifically enriched in the different symbiotic groups. A total of 80, 75 and 57 bacterial OTUs were specific for plant species without symbiosis, plant species forming associations with AMF or plant species associating with both AMF and rhizobia, respectively. Similarly, 9, 14 and 4 fungal OTUs were specific for these plant symbiont groups. Importantly, these generic symbiosis footprints in microbial community composition were also apparent in absence of the primary symbionts.

conclusionOur results reveal that symbiotic associations of the host plant leaves an imprint on the wider root microbiome - which we term the symbiotype. These findings suggest the existence of a fundamental assembly principle of root microbiomes, dependent on the symbiotic associations of the host plant.

Indexed as

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiPlant speciesRhizobiaRoot microbiomeSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID37525294
PMCPMC10391997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.