Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525278›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin in endoscopic endonasal skull base reconstruction: study protocol for a multicenter prospective, parallel-group, single-blinded randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.

Birgit Coucke, Anaïs Van Hoylandt, Mark Jorissen, Jeroen Meulemans, Thomas Decramer, Johannes van Loon, Vincent Vander Poorten, Tom Theys, Laura Van Gerven

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03910374 (Role of Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membranes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03910374 nacompletednot on this map

Role of Leukocyte- and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Membranes in Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Reconstruction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRan2018 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsCranial Sutures, ClosureArmsDural closure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Birgit CouckeResearch Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium. birgit.coucke@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0285-6665
Anaïs Van HoylandtNeurosurgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Mark JorissenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen MeulemansOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas DecramerResearch Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Johannes van LoonResearch Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Vincent Vander PoortenOtorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Tom Theys *Research Group Experimental Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy and Leuven Brain Institute, Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Laura Van Gerven *Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology & Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek T003018N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approaches (EETA) for skull base lesions have resulted in a significant increase in extent and complexity of skull base defects, demanding more elaborate and novel reconstruction techniques to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and to improve healing. Currently, commercially available fibrin sealants are often used to reinforce the skull base reconstruction. However, problems have been reported regarding hypersensitivity reactions, efficacy, and costs. This trial aims to investigate autologous leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes as an alternative for commercially available fibrin glues in EETA-related skull base reconstruction reinforcement. METHODS/

designThis multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial aims to demonstrate non-inferiority of L-PRF membranes compared to commercially available fibrin sealants in EETA cases (1) without intra-operative CSF-leak as dural or sellar floor closure reinforcement and (2) in EETA cases with intra-operative CSF-leak (or very large defects) in which a classic multilayer reconstruction has been made, as an additional sealing. The trial includes patients undergoing EETA in three different centers in Belgium. Patients are randomized in a 1:1 fashion comparing L-PRF with commercially available fibrin sealants. The primary endpoint is postoperative CSF leakage. Secondary endpoints are identification of risk factors for reconstruction failure, assessment of rhinological symptoms, and interference with postoperative imaging. Additionally, a cost-effectiveness analysis is performed. DISCUSSION: With this trial, we will evaluate the safety and efficacy of L-PRF compared to commercially available fibrin sealants.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03910374. Registered on 10 April 2019.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich FibrinCerebrospinal Fluid LeakEquivalence Trials as TopicFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesSkull BaseFibrin Tissue AdhesiveCerebrospinal fluid leakageDuraEndoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approachLeukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrinPreventionRegenerative medicineSkull base

Identifiers

PMID37525278
PMCPMC10388446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.