Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525243›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2023

A topology-marginal composite likelihood via a generalized phylogenetic pruning algorithm.

Seong-Hwan Jun, Hassan Nasif, Chris Jennings-Shaffer, David H Rich, Anna Kooperberg, Mathieu Fourment, Cheng Zhang, Marc A Suchard, Frederick A Matsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Leveraging graphical model techniques to study evolution on phylogenetic networks.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seong-Hwan Jun *Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, USA.
Hassan Nasif *Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Chris Jennings-ShafferPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
David H RichPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna KooperbergPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Mathieu FourmentAustralian Institute for Microbiology and Infection, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
Cheng ZhangSchool of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Marc A SuchardDepartment of Human Genetics, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Frederick A MatsenPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. matsen@fredhutch.org.

Funding

Fast and flexible Bayesian phylogenetics via modern machine learningR01AI162611 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MATSEN, FREDERICK ALBERT · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Statistical Innovation to Integrate Sequences and Phenotypes for Scalable Phylodynamic InferenceR01AI153044 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Marc A. Suchard · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI153044NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162611NIH HHS R01 AI162611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bayesian phylogenetics is a computationally challenging inferential problem. Classical methods are based on random-walk Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), where random proposals are made on the tree parameter and the continuous parameters simultaneously. Variational phylogenetics is a promising alternative to MCMC, in which one fits an approximating distribution to the unnormalized phylogenetic posterior. Previous work fit this variational approximation using stochastic gradient descent, which is the canonical way of fitting general variational approximations. However, phylogenetic trees are special structures, giving opportunities for efficient computation. In this paper we describe a new algorithm that directly generalizes the Felsenstein pruning algorithm (a.k.a. sum-product algorithm) to compute a composite-like likelihood by marginalizing out ancestral states and subtrees simultaneously. We show the utility of this algorithm by rapidly making point estimates for branch lengths of a multi-tree phylogenetic model. These estimates accord with a long MCMC run and with estimates obtained using a variational method, but are much faster to obtain. Thus, although generalized pruning does not lead to a variational algorithm as such, we believe that it will form a useful starting point for variational inference.

Identifiers

PMID37525243
PMCPMC10391877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.