ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2023
Impact of spinal sagittal malalignment on locomotive syndrome and physical function in community-dwelling middle aged and older women.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gluteal Muscle Degeneration Is Associated with Compensation Failure in Age-Related Spinopelvic Malalignment: A Cross-Sectional Study.Spine surgery and related research · 2026Article
- Review
- Utilizing machine learning to predict post-treatment outcomes in chronic non-specific neck pain patients undergoing cervical extension traction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impact of Skeletal Muscle Mass on Physical Function and Locomotive Syndrome of Pre- and Postoperative Adult Spinal Deformity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Don't Throw the 'Bio' out of the Bio-Psycho-Social Model: Editorial for Spine Rehabilitation in 2022 and Beyond.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdult spinal deformity has a substantially debilitating effect on older people's physical and mental health. However, the impact of sagittal malalignment on locomotive syndrome (LS), sarcopenia, and physical function in community-dwelling older women has not yet been clarified. This study aimed to investigate the association between these factors in community-dwelling middle aged and older women.
methodsA total of 361 women were recruited from participants performing aquatic exercises in a rural area of Japan. The body mass index, skeletal muscle mass index, trunk muscle mass, spinal inclination angle (SIA), grip strength, timed up-and-go test (TUG), maximum stride of the participants, and one-leg standing time were measured. Low back pain (LBP)- and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short-Form 8 questionnaire. Associations between the global sagittal alignment using SIA and investigating parameters were analyzed.
resultsThe prevalence of sarcopenia was 3.6%. The prevalence of LS (stages 1, 2, and 3) was 43.8% (158 of 361), and the number of participants in each LS stage was 203 (stage 0), 95 (stage 1), 28 (stage 2), and 35 (stage 3). The SIA was significantly correlated with the 25-question geriatric locomotive function scale (r' = 0.292, p < 0.001), ODI (r' = 0.267, p < 0.001), and TUG (r' = 0.453, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age. In the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values of SIA for LS ≥ stage 2 and ODI ≥ 20% were 5°.
conclusionsLBP-related QOL and physical performance were significantly associated with global sagittal alignment. Global sagittal alignment was correlated with the three-stage category of LS. The spinal inclination of 5° was a cutoff value to predict exacerbation of mobility function and HRQOL status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.