Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525141›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2023

Influence of scat ageing on the gut microbiome: how old is too old?

Alejandro Oliveros, Julien Terraube, Alexis L Levengood, Daniel Powell, Céline H Frère

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alejandro OliverosThe School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. uqaoliv9@uq.edu.au.
Julien TerraubeVulture Conservation Foundation, Wuhrstrasse 12, Zürich, CH-8003, Switzerland.
Alexis L LevengoodSchool of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
Daniel Powell *School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.
Céline H Frère *The School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study of the host-microbiome by the collection of non-invasive samples has the potential to become a powerful tool for conservation monitoring and surveillance of wildlife. However, multiple factors can bias the quality of data recovered from scats, particularly when field-collected samples are used given that the time of defecation is unknown. Previous studies using scats have shown that the impact of aerobic exposure on the microbial composition is species-specific, leading to different rates of change in microbial communities. However, the impact that this aging process has on the relationship between the bacterial and fungal composition has yet to be explored. In this study, we measured the effects of time post-defecation on bacterial and fungal compositions in a controlled experiment using scat samples from the endangered koala (Phascolarctos cinereus).

resultsWe found that the bacterial composition remained stable through the scat aging process, while the fungal composition did not. The absence of an increase in facultative anaerobes and the stable population of obligate anaerobic bacteria were likely due to our sampling from the inner portion of the scat. We report a cluster of fungal taxa that colonises scats after defecation which can dilute the genetic material from the autochthonous mycoflora and inhibit recovery.

conclusionWe emphasize the need to preserve the integrity of scat samples collected in the wild and combat the effects of time and provide strategies for doing so.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaPhascolarctidaeAnimalsAnimals, WildFecesConservationFaecal microbiomeFungiKoalaMetagenomicsNon-invasive samplingTime Series

Identifiers

PMID37525141
PMCPMC10388479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.