Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525112›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2023

Clinical outcome of different embryo transfer strategies after late rescue ICSI procedure: a 10-year total fertilisation failure cohort study.

Xiaxuan Zhu, Tian Tian, Dina Jiesisibieke, Shilin Fang, Nan Zhang, Jinxi Ma, Yuqi Xia, Ping Liu, Rong Li, Jie Qiao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Xiaxuan Zhu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-5202
Tian Tian *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Dina JiesisibiekeCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Shilin FangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Nan ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jinxi MaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yuqi XiaCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ping LiuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Rong LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jie QiaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Rui YangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, No. 49 North Huayuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. yrjeff@126.com.
Peking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project Z191100006619085National key research and development program 2021YFC2700605National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLate rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection (r-ICSI) has not been widely accepted as an alternative solution for unexpected total fertilisation failure (TFF) after in vitro fertilisation (IVF), due to the time-dependent in vitro deterioration of oocyte quality and endometrial growth not being synchronised with embryo development. This study aimed to evaluate the safety profile and effectiveness of freeze-all blastocyst transfer in combination with late r-ICSI.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study carried out at the Reproductive Centre of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. All participants received treatment between 2009 and 2019. 2,270 patients in the aggregate encountered unexpected TFF during 149,054 cycles of IVF and adopted a late r-ICSI procedure. Among these patients, 263 women did not have cleavage-stage embryos available for evaluation. The remaining patients were grouped according to different embryo transfer (ET) strategies (926 women in Group 1 underwent fresh ET, 365 women in Group 2 underwent freeze-all ET, 716 women in Group 3 experienced blastulation failure). Patients received different ET strategies after r-ICSI, with the main outcome measures included live birth rate (LBR), cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), and conservative cLBR.

resultsTFF occurred in 7.4% of all IVF cycles. Group 1 tended to be older at oocyte retrieval, with more infertile years, higher follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, higher gonadotropin consumption, and fewer oocytes retrieved. Group 2 exhibited considerably better LBRs following the first ET cycle (37.53% vs. 4.64%) and cLBRs (52.60% vs. 8.21%). After adjustment for covariates using binary logistic regression analyses, Group 2 still showed better obstetric performance in LBRs [OR:11.77, 95% CI (8.42-16.45)], cLBRs (OR:11.29, 95% CI (7.84-16.27)], and conservative cLBRs (OR:2.55, 95% CI (1.83-3.55)]. Additionally, the two groups showed similar miscarriage rates, whilst no new-borns with malformations or congenital diseases were reported.

conclusionsFreeze-all blastocyst stage ET serves as an optimal strategy to support late r-ICSI. However, for women with limited oocytes available for r-ICSI use, weighing the benefits against the costs of the procedure might be prudent before implementing in vitro blastulation.

Indexed as

Live BirthSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicBirth RateCohort StudiesEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilizationFertilization in VitroHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesSemenBlastocystFreeze-all embryo transferIn vitro blastulationRescue intracytoplasmic sperm injectionTotal fertilisation failure

Identifiers

PMID37525112
PMCPMC10388511
OpenAlexW4385418724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.