ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2023
Console and bedside surgeon fused robot-assisted thoracic surgery.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anatomical lung resection using the hinotori surgical robotic system: initial clinical experience with a standardized multiport approach.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Dual-port robot-assisted thoracic surgery using hinotori™ surgical system.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- The impact of institutional surgical volume on perioperative outcomes in uniportal thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections: a nationwide study in Japan.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Fusion surgery in robot-assisted esophagectomy: stepwise learning curves across the da Vinci™ and hinotori™ platforms.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Surgical technical aspects of uniportal hybrid RATS and biportal pure RATS using a subcostal port.Journal of visualized surgery · 2026Article
- Novel, noninvasive, extended reality-aided pulmonary tumor marking method for sublobar resection in minimally invasive surgery.JTCVS techniques · 2025Article
- Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A real-world study evaluating the safety and utility of a two-row stapler reload on pulmonary vasculature.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, even thoracic surgery has seen an increase in the use of robotic surgical systems, and robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) is considered one of the main issues. While RATS is associated with solo manipulative freedom and high-definition optical systems, several disadvantages, such as the lack of tactile sensation and difficult learning curves for the whole team, have been raised. Therefore, to overcome these issues, we developed a 'fusion surgery' approach combining a robotic procedure with manual maneuvers, where the table surgeon retracts the lung and staples the pulmonary vasculature and bronchus. Herein, we introduce our 'fusion surgery' procedure and elaborate on its advantage from technical and educational perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37525063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.