ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2023
Comparison of volumetric and areal bone mineral density in CT and scout scans using spectral detector technology.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing bone health evaluation in Hermann's tortoises (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparison of bone mineral density quantification in dogs using spectral detector computed tomography versus phantom-based conventional computed tomography.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine whether denoised areal bone mineral density (BMD) measurements from scout scans in spectral detector computed tomography (CT) correlate with volumetric trabecular BMD for opportunistic osteoporosis screening.
methodsA 64-slice single-source dual-layer spectral CT scanner was used to acquire scout scan data of 228 lumbar vertebral bodies within 57 patients. Scout scans in anterior-posterior (AP) view were performed with a dose of < 0.06 mSv and spectrally decomposed into areal BMD (aBMD) values. A spectral dictionary denoising algorithm was applied to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Volumetric trabecular bone mineral density (vBMD) was determined via material decomposition. A 3D convolutional network for image segmentation and labeling was applied for automated vBMD quantification. Projected maps were used to compare the classification accuracy of AP and lateral scout scans.
resultsThe denoising algorithm led to the minimization of anticorrelated noise in spectral maps and an SNR increase from 5.23 to 13.4 (p < 0.002). Correlation analysis between vBMD and measured AP aBMD, projected AP, and lateral aBMD showed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68, 0.81, and 0.90, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for the osteoporosis classification task were higher in lateral projection images than in AP crystallizing in an increased area under the curve value of 0.99 versus 0.90.
conclusionDenoised material-specific aBMD maps show a positive correlation to vBMD, enabling spectral scout scans as an opportunistic predictor for osteoporotic patients. This could be applied routinely as a screening tool in patients undergoing a CT examination. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Scout-based DEXA could be applied routinely as a screening tool in patients undergoing a CT examination. KEY POINTS: • Spectral scout scans can be used as a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry-like screening tool. • Spectral dictionary denoising on projection images increases the signal-to-noise ratio. • Positive correlation between volumetric and areal bone mineral density is observed. • Lateral projections increase osteoporosis classification accuracy compared to anterior-posterior projections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.