ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023
Detection and Quantification of Exhaled Breath Condensate and Dyspnea Correlation in Stable COPD: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe existing research data are still not able to provide an answer to the issue of the correlation between dyspnea and inflammation in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The purpose of this study was to assess the possible relationship between a noninvasive medium called the exhaled breath condensate (EBC) and dyspnea in stable COPD patients.
methodsA group of ten patients (five with and five without COPD) participated. The exhaled breath condensate was analyzed for the first time with a high-resolution device, the Accusizer 780SIS. The particle concentration of the EBC was measured and correlated with tools used for dyspnea assessment and clinical picture (modified Research Council dyspnea scale, mMRC scale; modified Borg dyspnea scale; and COPD Assessment Test, CAT scale). Because of the very small sample size (Ν = 10), bootstrapping method (applying 5000 bootstrap resamples with 95% confidence intervals) was used to derive robust estimates of standard errors and confidence intervals for estimates of means and correlation coefficients. Bootstrap works well in small sample sizes by ensuring the correctness of tests.
resultsThe bootstrap means of EBC, mMRC, Borg, and CAT scales were 223863.43 (95% CI, 151308.58-297603.04), 1.30 (95% CI, 0.70-1.90), 1.55 (95% CI, 0.55-2.80), and 6.70 (95% CI, 4.80-8.60), respectively. The bootstrap Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) of EBC, mMRC, Borg, and CAT scales were 0.889 (95% CI, 0.716-0.979), 0.641 (95% CI, -0.542-0.887), and 0.569 (95% CI, -0.184-0.912), respectively.
conclusionsThe effect size of the correlations is significantly high at the 0.01 level (two-tailed) between the EBC and the mMRC scale, less high at the 0.05 level (two-tailed) between the EBC and the Borg dyspnea scale and marginally with the CAT scale, respectively. Studies with larger samples will be needed to obtain more reliable results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37525030What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.