Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37525002›Full record

ReviewAntonie van Leeuwenhoek2023

Antoni van Leeuwenhoek 1723-2023: a review to commemorate Van Leeuwenhoek's death, 300 years ago : For submission to Antonie van Leeuwenhoek journal of microbiology.

Lesley A Robertson

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. CLASI-FISH Imaging of Fusobacterium in Oral Microbial Communities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Microbiota in Children and Adolescents with Asthma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Ionic Liquid Crystals as Chromogenic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lesley A RobertsonDepartment of Biotechnology and Science Centre, Delft University of Technology, Van der Burghweg 1, 2628 CS, Delft, The Netherlands. L.A.Robertson@TUDelft.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2119-7386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the 300 years since Van Leeuwenhoek died, some of the details around his life and his work have provided material for discussion or dispute. As archives and libraries are being scanned and technology improves, information is becoming more readily available. This review therefore aims to take a new look at some of those discussions, and Van Leeuwenhoek's possible experimental methods. Digital photography has made it possible to show exactly what can be seen through his simple microscopes, and how he could have obtained his results by, for example, modifying his microscopes and lighting. Equally, the completion of the series known as the Collected Letters, begun in 1931 with volume 1 published in 1939 and to be completed in 2023, allows researchers to see complete letters in English and modern Dutch. Theories about experimental methods can be tested and the results recorded photographically. Additionally, new, non-destructive techniques such as neutron tomography have improved the evaluation of the authenticity of surviving microscopes.

Indexed as

MicrobiologyMicroscopyHistory, 17th CenturyLeeuwenhoekMethodsMicro-photographyModern equipmentSimple microscopes

Identifiers

PMID37525002
PMCPMC10509104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.