Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524988›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023

Visualisation Approaches in Technology-Enhanced Medical Simulation Learning: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Aleksander Dawidziuk, George Miller, Johann Malawana

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aleksander DawidziukThe Healthcare Leadership Academy Research Collaborative, London, UK.
George MillerThe Healthcare Leadership Academy Research Collaborative, London, UK.
Johann MalawanaThe Healthcare Leadership Academy Research Collaborative, London, UK. academic.enquiries@medics.academy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) has been proposed as an approach to minimise the healthcare workforce shortage preventing universal healthcare coverage. Simulation-based medical education is a well-established teaching method. Little is known about effective strategies to translate in-person medical simulation teaching into a virtual world. This work aimed to review the literature on approaches to visualisation in technology-enhanced medical simulation. A systematic search strategy was optimised using three databases: Embase, MEDLINE, and APA PsycInfo. Additional papers were identified through cross-referencing. The last date of this search was 3 January 2022. The articles were analysed qualitatively. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2 tools. The search yielded 656 results with 9 additional papers identified through cross-referencing. Following deduplication and exclusions, 23 articles were included in a qualitative synthesis of evidence. Offline and online computer-based modules with virtual patient cases or practical skills simulations were identified as the most prevalent clinical simulation teaching modalities. Visualisation approaches included text, images, animations, videos, and 3D environments. Significant heterogeneity of study designs with a moderate risk of bias was established. Based on the current data, the virtual patient scenarios should use natural language input interfaces enriched with video and voice recordings, 3D animations, and short text descriptions to make the patient management experience more lifelike and increase knowledge retention. However, there is no agreed framework for assessing the pedagogical value of these innovations. High-quality randomised controlled trials of TEL-based clinical simulation are essential to advance the field.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalHealth PersonnelComputersComputer SimulationHumansLearningMedical educationMedical simulationTechnology-enhanced learningTELVisualisation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.