ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2023
The Third Dimension: 3D Printed Replicas and Other Alternatives to Cadaver-Based Learning.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing the 'third dimension' of complex human form or anatomy has been an objective of artists and anatomists from the renaissance in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries onwards. Many of these drawings, paintings, and sculptures have had a profound influence on medical teaching and the learning resources we took for granted until around 40 years ago. Since then, the teaching of human anatomy has undergone significant change, especially in respect of the technologies available to augment or replace traditional cadaver-based dissection instruction. Whilst resources such as atlases, wall charts, plastic models, and images from the Internet have been around for many decades, institutions looking to reduce the reliance on dissection-based teaching in medical or health professional training programmes have in more recent times increasingly had access to a range of other options for classroom-based instruction. These include digital resources and software programmes and plastinated specimens, although the latter come with a range of ethical and cost considerations. However, the urge to recapitulate the 'third dimension' of anatomy has seen the recent advent of novel resources in the form of 3D printed replicas. These 3D printed replicas of normal human anatomy dissections are based on a combination of radiographic imaging and surface scanning that captures critical 3D anatomical information. The final 3D files can either be augmented with false colour or made to closely resemble traditional prosections prior to printing. This chapter details the journey we and others have taken in the search for the 'third dimension'. The future of a haptically identical, anatomically accurate replica of human cadaver specimens for surgical and medical training is nearly upon us. Indeed, the need for hard copy replicas may eventually be superseded by the opportunities afforded by virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR).
Indexed as
Identifiers
37524983What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.