Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524980›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024

Comparison of acute responses in spinal excitability between older and young people after neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Martina Scalia, Martina Parrella, Riccardo Borzuola, Andrea Macaluso

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martina ScaliaDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy. m.scalia@studenti.uniroma4.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-2435
Martina ParrellaDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Riccardo BorzuolaDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Andrea MacalusoDepartment of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Rome, Italy.
Foro Italico University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aims at comparing acute responses in spinal excitability, as measured by H-reflex, between older and young individuals, following a single session of NMES superimposed onto voluntary isometric contractions of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles (NMES+), with respect to passive NMES (pNMES) and voluntary isometric contractions only (ISO).

methodsThirty-two volunteers, 16 older (OLDER) and 16 young (YOUNG), were asked to sustain a constant force at 20% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles in the dominant limb during each of the 3 conditions (NMES+ , pNMES and ISO). Fifteen repetitions of 6 s were performed, with a resting interval of 6 s between repetitions. Before and after each condition, soleus H-reflexes were elicited by percutaneous electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve and H-reflex amplitudes recorded by surface EMG.

resultsIn OLDER, H-reflex amplitude did not change following any experimental condition (ISO: p = 0.203; pNMES: p = 0.542; NMES+: p = 0.431) compared to baseline. On the contrary, in YOUNG, H-reflex amplitudes significantly increased (p < 0.000) and decreased (p = 0.001) following NMES+ and pNMES, respectively, while there was no significant change in reflex responses following ISO (p = 0.772).

conclusionThe lack of change in H-reflex responses following either NMES+ or pNMES might reflect a reduced ability of older people in modulating spinal excitability after the conditions. Specifically, an age-related alteration in controlling mechanisms at presynaptic level was suggested.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalTibial NerveAdolescentAgedElectric StimulationElectromyographyH-ReflexHumansMuscle ContractionReflexH-reflexNMESOlder individualsSoleusSpinal excitability

Identifiers

PMID37524980
OpenAlexW4385415500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.