ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024
Comparison of acute responses in spinal excitability between older and young people after neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probing gait adaptations: The impact of aging on dynamic stability and reflex control mechanisms under varied weight-bearing conditions.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- Acute modulation of common synaptic inputs and motor unit discharge rates following neuromuscular electrical stimulation superimposed onto voluntary contractions.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Frequency-dependent effects of superimposed NMES on spinal excitability in upper and lower limb muscles.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Does Not Influence Spinal Excitability in Multiple Sclerosis Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims at comparing acute responses in spinal excitability, as measured by H-reflex, between older and young individuals, following a single session of NMES superimposed onto voluntary isometric contractions of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles (NMES+), with respect to passive NMES (pNMES) and voluntary isometric contractions only (ISO).
methodsThirty-two volunteers, 16 older (OLDER) and 16 young (YOUNG), were asked to sustain a constant force at 20% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the ankle plantar-flexor muscles in the dominant limb during each of the 3 conditions (NMES+ , pNMES and ISO). Fifteen repetitions of 6 s were performed, with a resting interval of 6 s between repetitions. Before and after each condition, soleus H-reflexes were elicited by percutaneous electrical stimulation of the posterior tibial nerve and H-reflex amplitudes recorded by surface EMG.
resultsIn OLDER, H-reflex amplitude did not change following any experimental condition (ISO: p = 0.203; pNMES: p = 0.542; NMES+: p = 0.431) compared to baseline. On the contrary, in YOUNG, H-reflex amplitudes significantly increased (p < 0.000) and decreased (p = 0.001) following NMES+ and pNMES, respectively, while there was no significant change in reflex responses following ISO (p = 0.772).
conclusionThe lack of change in H-reflex responses following either NMES+ or pNMES might reflect a reduced ability of older people in modulating spinal excitability after the conditions. Specifically, an age-related alteration in controlling mechanisms at presynaptic level was suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.