Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524895›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023

Intra-Arterial Injection of Temporary Embolic Material Through a Needle Inserted into the Radial or Ulnar Artery for Distal and Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of 92 Patients.

Takatoshi Kubo, Koichi Miyazaki, Masahiko Shibuya, Eiji Sugihara, Masaya Nakata, Yuji Okuno

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mastering Musculoskeletal Interventions: CVIR's Newest Special Issue.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Takatoshi Kubo *Department of Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-1980
Koichi Miyazaki *Musculoskeletal Intervention Center, Okuno Clinic Osaka, 3rd Fl Shinsaibashi Front Bldg., 3-5-11, Minamifunaba, Chuo-ku, Osaka City, Osaka, 542-0081, Japan.
Masahiko ShibuyaMusculoskeletal Intervention Center, Okuno Clinic Kobe, B1 Fl, 1-2-1, Sannomiyacho, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0021, Japan.
Eiji SugiharaMusculoskeletal Intervention Center, Okuno Clinic Tokyo, 4th Fl Ginrei Bldg., 7-8-4, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan.
Masaya NakataMusculoskeletal Intervention Center, Okuno Clinic Tokyo, 4th Fl Ginrei Bldg., 7-8-4, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan.
Yuji OkunoMusculoskeletal Intervention Center, Okuno Clinic Tokyo, 4th Fl Ginrei Bldg., 7-8-4, Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 106-0032, Japan. okuno@okuno-y-clinic.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7345-4618
Furuno (Japan) · JPAkebono Clinic · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial injection of imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) via a needle placed into the radial artery or ulnar artery (RA/UA) for distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis (DIP/PIP-OA). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective single-arm cohort study. Ninety-two patients [92% women, mean (SD) age 55(8.3) years] with a primary DIP/PIP-OA meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for hand osteoarthritis with pain ≥ 4 on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) were enrolled. All procedures were performed by injecting IPM/CS through a 24-gauge needle percutaneously inserted into the RA/UA. Two procedures were planned; the second procedure was scheduled 1-2 months after the first. NRS, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, and procedure-related adverse events were evaluated.

resultsTechnical success, defined as injection of IPM/CS into the RA/UA, was achieved in all patients. Clinical success, defined as a reduction of 2 points or more in the NRS at 12 months, was 77% (95% confidence interval 68-85%). The NRS improved from the baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months (7.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 2.6, 3.9 ± 2.7, and 4.0 ± 2.8, respectively, all p < 0.001). The QuickDASH score improved from the baseline to 12 months (27 ± 15 vs. 19 ± 17, p < 0.001) respectively. No major adverse events were observed.

conclusionsIntra-arterial injection of IPM/CS is a feasible treatment option for DIP/PIP-OA.

Indexed as

OsteoarthritisUlnar ArteryCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesDistal interphalangeal jointHand osteoarthritisImipenem/cilastatinIntra-arterial injectionProximal interphalangeal joint

Identifiers

PMID37524895
OpenAlexW4385410536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.