ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2023
Intra-Arterial Injection of Temporary Embolic Material Through a Needle Inserted into the Radial or Ulnar Artery for Distal and Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Retrospective Study of 92 Patients.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Transarterial periarticular embolization as a treatment option for chronic joint pain].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Transarterial embolization for chronic wrist pain: a preliminary study of feasibility, safety, and pain reduction.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Tophaceous gout of the knee: successful treatment with transarterial microembolization.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Transradial Transarterial Microembolization Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction with Oral Benzodiazepine Premedication.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Transcatheter Arterial Embolization as a Treatment for Chronic Pain due to Osteoarthritis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Severe complications following transarterial microembolization for a micro arterio-venous fistula in a patient with chronic venous ulcer: a case report.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Article
- Multifaceted Treatment Using Advanced Modalities for Refractory Achilles Tendinopathy: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Short-term clinical outcomes of transarterial embolization for symptomatic hand osteoarthritis refractory to conservative treatment.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2024Article
- Mastering Musculoskeletal Interventions: CVIR's Newest Special Issue.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the efficacy and safety of intra-arterial injection of imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) via a needle placed into the radial artery or ulnar artery (RA/UA) for distal interphalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis (DIP/PIP-OA). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis is a retrospective single-arm cohort study. Ninety-two patients [92% women, mean (SD) age 55(8.3) years] with a primary DIP/PIP-OA meet the American College of Rheumatology criteria for hand osteoarthritis with pain ≥ 4 on the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS) were enrolled. All procedures were performed by injecting IPM/CS through a 24-gauge needle percutaneously inserted into the RA/UA. Two procedures were planned; the second procedure was scheduled 1-2 months after the first. NRS, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale, and procedure-related adverse events were evaluated.
resultsTechnical success, defined as injection of IPM/CS into the RA/UA, was achieved in all patients. Clinical success, defined as a reduction of 2 points or more in the NRS at 12 months, was 77% (95% confidence interval 68-85%). The NRS improved from the baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months (7.8 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 2.6, 3.9 ± 2.7, and 4.0 ± 2.8, respectively, all p < 0.001). The QuickDASH score improved from the baseline to 12 months (27 ± 15 vs. 19 ± 17, p < 0.001) respectively. No major adverse events were observed.
conclusionsIntra-arterial injection of IPM/CS is a feasible treatment option for DIP/PIP-OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.