ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023
A gender specific risk assessment of coronary heart disease based on physical examination data.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- HybridGNN: a graph neural network approach for human miRNA-disease association prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Machine learning ensemble meets clinical practice: developing a real-world risk prediction model for metabolic syndrome using super learner and scorecard approaches.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-powered prediction of diabetic complications: from clinical data to molecular omics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Interferon-primed immune landscapes predict immune-related adverse events during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Developing a Prediction Model for Suicidality Among COVID-19 Patients in Korea Using Timely Data From the National Center for Disaster and Trauma.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- An artificial intelligence-based approach for identifying the proteins regulating liquid-liquid phase separation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Classification of Acid and Alkaline Enzymes Based on Normalized Van der Waals Volume Features.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2025Article
- Cancer Drug Sensitivity Prediction Based on Deep Transfer Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- An Easy and Quick Risk-Stratified Early Forewarning Model for Septic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit: Development, Validation, and Interpretation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Female sex is associated with short-term mortality in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: A propensity-matched analysis.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Coronary heart disease risk prediction based on GAIN imputation and interpretable machine learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- A machine learning framework for predicting cognitive impairment in aging populations using urinary metal and demographic data.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Excavation of gene markers associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based on interrelationships of gene expression.IET systems biology · 2024Article
- Human essential gene identification based on feature fusion and feature screening.IET systems biology · 2024Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for digital lung cancer prescreening in Chinese populations with missing data.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of microbe-disease signed associations via multi-scale variational graph autoencoder based on signed message propagation.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Early identification of macrophage activation syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus with machine learning.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Prediction of blood-brain barrier penetrating peptides based on data augmentation with Augur.BMC biology · 2024Article
- IGCNSDA: unraveling disease-associated snoRNAs with an interpretable graph convolutional network.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale screening for the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) is crucial for its prevention and management. Physical examination data has the advantages of wide coverage, large capacity, and easy collection. Therefore, here we report a gender-specific cascading system for risk assessment of CHD based on physical examination data. The dataset consists of 39,538 CHD patients and 640,465 healthy individuals from the Luzhou Health Commission in Sichuan, China. Fifty physical examination characteristics were considered, and after feature screening, ten risk factors were identified. To facilitate large-scale CHD risk screening, a CHD risk model was developed using a fully connected network (FCN). For males, the model achieves AUCs of 0.8671 and 0.8659, respectively on the independent test set and the external validation set. For females, the AUCs of the model are 0.8991 and 0.9006, respectively on the independent test set and the external validation set. Furthermore, to enhance the convenience and flexibility of the model in clinical and real-life scenarios, we established a CHD risk scorecard base on logistic regression (LR). The results show that, for both males and females, the AUCs of the scorecard on the independent test set and the external verification set are only slightly lower (<0.05) than those of the corresponding prediction model, indicating that the scorecard construction does not result in a significant loss of information. To promote CHD personal lifestyle management, an online CHD risk assessment system has been established, which can be freely accessed at http://lin-group.cn/server/CHD/index.html .
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.