Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524807›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Antibody binding of amyloid beta peptide epimers/isomers and ramifications for immunotherapies and drug development.

Elizabeth R Readel, Arzoo Patel, Joshua I Putman, Siqi Du, Daniel W Armstrong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth R ReadelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Arzoo PatelDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Joshua I PutmanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Siqi DuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Daniel W ArmstrongDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA. sec4dwa@uta.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular deposition of amyloid beta (Aβ) peptide is a contributing factor of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Considerable effort has been expended to create effective antibodies, or immunotherapies, targeting Aβ peptides. A few immunotherapies are thought to provide some benefit. It is possible that a contributing factor to the responses of such therapies may be the presence of modified, or aberrant, Aβ peptides found in AD patients. These aberrations include the isomerization and epimerization of L-Asp and L-Ser residues to form D-Asp, L/D-isoAsp, and D-Ser residues, respectively. An effective methodology is essential to isolate all Aβ peptides and then to quantify and locate the aberrant amino acids. Modifications to Aβ peptides may elevate the deposition of Aβ plaques and/or contribute to the neurodegeneration in AD patients, and may alter the binding affinity to antibodies. Herein, we used immunoprecipitation to examine the binding affinity of four antibodies against 18 epimeric and/or isomeric Aβ peptides compared to wild type (all L) Aβ peptide. Tandem mass spectrometry was used as a detection method, which also was found to produce highly variable results for epimeric and/or isomeric Aβ.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodiesDrug DevelopmentHumansImmunotherapyIsomerismPeptide FragmentsPlaque, AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodiesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID37524807
PMCPMC10390520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.