Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524765›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2023

Serum and supplemental vitamin D levels and insulin resistance in T2DM populations: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Xingxing Lei, Qian Zhou, Yanmei Wang, Shunlian Fu, Zinan Li, Qiu Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xingxing Lei *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Qian Zhou *Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Yanmei WangHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Shunlian FuHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Zinan LiHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, 610072, Sichuan, China.
Qiu ChenHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Sichuan Province, No. 39, Shi-er-Qiao Road, Chengdu, 610072, People's Republic of China. chenqiu1005@cdutcm.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-6957-9821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies have shown a negative correlation between Vitamin D level and the likelihood of developing insulin resistance (IR) and/or diabetes over time, yet evidence remains inconsistent. In this meta-analysis and systematic review, we strive to define the potential association between serum or supplemental Vitamin D Levels and insulin resistance respectively, as well as the contribution of Vitamin D to type 2 diabetes, and to summarize the biologic plausibility of Vitamin D. Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched for this Systematic Literature Review (SLR) to find appropriate observational studies and clinical trials published in English through to July 2022. EndNote (version X9) is used to manage the literature search results. We calculated Standard Mean Differences (SMDs) and Risk Ratios (RRs) with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs), separately, for continuous and dichotomous outcomes. The correlation coefficients were normalized to z values through Fisher's z-transformation to calculate the relevant statistics. Meta-analyses were carried out for all comparisons, based on a random-effects pooling model. Data analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.3) and STATA (version 15.1). All statistical tests were two-sided, with P < 0.05 were regarded as significant. In our current meta-analysis, there are 18 RCTs and 20 observational studies including 1243 and 11,063 participants respectively. In the overall analysis, the diabetic with Vitamin D supplement treatment group showed significantly improve serum insulin (SMD =  - 0.265, 95% CI - 0.394 to - 0.136, P < 0.05), glucose (SMD =  - 0.17, 95% CI - 0.301to - 0.039, P < 0.05) and HOMA-IR (SMD =  - 0.441, 95% CI - 0.582 to - 0.3, P < 0.05) compared with the routine treatment group. Correlation analysis results showed that all three outcomes were significantly correlated in a negative manner with raised Vitamin D (insulin: r =  - 0.08 95% =  - 0.12 to - 0.04; glucose: r =  - 0.06 95% =  - 0.11 to - 0.01; HOMA-IR: r =  - 0.08 95% =  - 0.09 to - 0.06). Results of overall analysis proved that vitamin D has shown significant effect on regulates insulin resistance, and there is a significant inverse association between serum Vitamin D level and IR. Vitamin D supplementation is expected to be integrated into conventional medical approaches to prevent type 2 diabetes and to mitigate the burden of diabetes for individuals and society.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022348295.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Insulin ResistanceDietary SupplementsGlucoseHumansInsulinObservational Studies as TopicVitamin DVitaminsGlucoseInsulinVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID37524765
PMCPMC10390579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.