Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524737›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2023

Paving the way to better understand the effects of prolonged spaceflight on operational performance and its neural bases.

A C Stahn, D Bucher, P Zu Eulenburg, P Denise, N Smith, F Pagnini, O White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A C StahnUnit of Experimental Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. astahn@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-4944
D BucherIZN-Neurobiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
P Zu EulenburgInstitute for Neuroradiology & German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3729-4570
P DeniseNormandie Univ. UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, CYCERON, Caen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-7692
N SmithProtective Security and Resilience Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-8978
F PagniniDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-4211
O WhiteUniversité de Bourgogne INSERM-U1093 Cognition, Action, and Sensorimotor Plasticity, Dijon, France. olivier.white@u-bourgogne.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-1329

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Space exploration objectives will soon move from low Earth orbit to distant destinations like Moon and Mars. The present work provides an up-to-date roadmap that identifies critical research gaps related to human behavior and performance in altered gravity and space. The roadmap summarizes (1) key neurobehavioral challenges associated with spaceflight, (2) the need to consider sex as a biological variable, (3) the use of integrative omics technologies to elucidate mechanisms underlying changes in the brain and behavior, and (4) the importance of understanding the neural representation of gravity throughout the brain and its multisensory processing. We then highlight the need for a variety of target-specific countermeasures, and a personalized administration schedule as two critical strategies for mitigating potentially adverse effects of spaceflight on the central nervous system and performance. We conclude with a summary of key priorities for the roadmaps of current and future space programs and stress the importance of new collaborative strategies across agencies and researchers for fostering an integrative cross- and transdisciplinary approach from cells, molecules to neural circuits and cognitive performance. Finally, we highlight that space research in neurocognitive science goes beyond monitoring and mitigating risks in astronauts but could also have significant benefits for the population on Earth.

Identifiers

PMID37524737
PMCPMC10390562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.