Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524732›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparative biological activity of abamectin formulations on root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) infecting cucumber plants: in vivo and in vitro.

Magdy A Massoud, Abdel Fattah S A Saad, Mohamed S Khalil, Mosher Zakaria, Shady Selim

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Magdy A MassoudPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba-Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21531, Egypt.
Abdel Fattah S A SaadPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba-Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21531, Egypt.
Mohamed S KhalilFungicides, Bactericides and Nematicides Department, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, El-Sabheya, Alexandria, Egypt. melonema@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1869-2055
Mosher ZakariaPlant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba-Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, 21531, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0915-0019
Shady SelimFaculty of Desert and Environmental Agriculture, Department of Pesticide Chemistry and Technology, Matrouh University, Matrouh, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6971-914X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) are considered one of the most destructive diseases in the world. In Egypt, farmers primarily rely on chemical nematicides, which have become costly to control. Currently, abamectin is a bio-based pesticide used as an alternative tool against Meloidogyne spp. on cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L.). During the current research, four tested abamectin formulations were DIVA (1.8% EW), RIOMECTIN (5% ME), AGRIMEC GOLD (8.4% SC) and ZORO (3.6% EC) compared with two reference nematicides namely, CROP NEMA (5% CS) and TERVIGO (2% SC). The main results showed that, in vitro study elucidated that the most effective formulations of abamectin as a larvicidal were EW with LC

Indexed as

Cucumis sativusPesticidesTylenchoideaAnimalsAntinematodal AgentsIvermectinabamectinAntinematodal AgentsIvermectinPesticides

Identifiers

PMID37524732
PMCPMC10390523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.