ArticleNature communications2023
Late Cambrian geomagnetic instability after the onset of inner core nucleation.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Water-induced mantle overturn explains high Archean paleointensities.National science review · 2026Article
- Earth's magnetic field and its relationship to the origin of life, evolution and planetary habitability.National science review · 2025Review
- Completing the loop of the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous true polar wander event.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Ediacaran Period marks a pivotal time in geodynamo evolution when the geomagnetic field is thought to approach the weak state where kinetic energy exceeds magnetic energy, as manifested by an extremely high frequency of polarity reversals, high secular variation, and an ultralow dipole field strength. However, how the geodynamo transitioned from this state into one with more stable field behavior is unknown. Here, we address this issue through a high-resolution magnetostratigraphic investigation of the ~494.5 million-year-old Jiangshanian Global Standard Stratotype and Point (GSSP) section in South China. Our paleomagnetic results document zones with rapid reversals, stable polarity and a ~80 thousand-year-long interval without a geocentric axial dipole field. From these changes, we suggest that for most of the Cambrian, the solid inner core had not yet grown to a size sufficiently large to stabilize the geodynamo. This unusual field behavior can explain paleomagnetic data used to define paradoxical true polar wander, supporting instead the rotational stability of the solid Earth during the great radiation of life in the Cambrian.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.