Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37524388›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2024

Changing awareness and sources of tobacco and e-cigarettes among children and adolescents in Great Britain.

Jennie C Parnham, Charlotte Vrinten, Hazel Cheeseman, Laura Bunce, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Filippos T Filippidis, Anthony A Laverty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennie C ParnhamPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4385-2153
Charlotte VrintenPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6187-0638
Hazel CheesemanAction on Smoking and Health (ASH), London, UK.
Laura BunceAction on Smoking and Health (ASH), London, UK.
Nicholas S HopkinsonNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0454
Filippos T FilippidisPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-2559
Anthony A LavertyPublic Health Policy Evaluation Unit, Imperial College London, London, UK a.laverty@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1318-8439

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt is illegal in the UK to sell tobacco or nicotine e-cigarettes to people under the age of 18 years, as is displaying tobacco cigarettes at the point of sale. This paper examined changes in exposure to display of these products in shops and sources of these products among children and adolescent users over time

methodsData from representative repeated online cross-sectional surveys of youth in Great Britain (11-18 years) were used (2018-2022; n=12 445). Outcome measures included noticing product displays and sources of e-cigarettes and tobacco cigarettes. Logistic regressions examined the associations of these outcome variables over time and with sociodemographic variables.

resultsOf 12 040 participants with complete data, 10.1% used some form of nicotine product (4.2% cigarettes, 2.9% e-cigarettes, 3.0% both) at least occasionally. The likelihood of noticing tobacco cigarettes on display fell over time for both supermarkets (2018: 67.1% to 2022: 58.5%) and small shops (2018: 81.3% to 2022: 66.3%), but the likelihood of noticing e-cigarettes in supermarkets rose (2018: 57.4% to 2022: 66.5%). Sources of tobacco cigarettes did not differ over time, but e-cigarette users were more likely to get their e-cigarettes from small shops in 2022 (51.2%) vs 2019 (34.2%) (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.24, 3.29).

conclusionThis study provides evidence that current policies to limit awareness of and access to both tobacco and e-cigarettes among adolescents in the UK may not be effective. UK policies on the advertising, promotion and sale of both tobacco and e-cigarettes need to be reinforced to deter use among children and adolescents.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsAdolescentChildCommerceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomVapingAdvertising and PromotionPackaging and LabellingPublic policy

Identifiers

PMID37524388
PMCPMC11672015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.