ArticleJournal of periodontal & implant science2023
Revisiting the measurement of keratinized gingiva: a cross-sectional study comparing an intraoral scanner with clinical parameters.
Article in Journal of periodontal & implant science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interdental Papilla Morphology in Relation to Periodontal Soft- and Hard-Tissue Dimensions in Young Adults: A Clinical and CBCT-Based Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of gingival biotype and bone thickness in maxillary implant patients: A clinical study based on cone-beam computed tomography.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Salusin-α and Salusin-β Levels in Human Saliva Samples from Patients with Gingivitis and Periodontitis: A Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Clinical Evaluation of Amniotic Membrane as an Adjunct to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Restoration in the Management of Gingival Recession Associated With Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized Split Mouth Trial.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Assessment of gingival characteristics by professional versus smartphone imaging.Journal of advanced periodontology & implant dentistry · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Detection and Measurement of Keratinized Gingiva in Dental Photographs: Validation Using Reference Retainers.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- Long-term assessment of a modified tunneling technique for root coverage in lower anterior gingival recession: a retrospective study.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the relationships between gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized gingiva width (KGW), papilla height (PH), and crown ratio (CR) by employing transgingival probing and an intraoral scanner (IOS).
methodsThis cross-sectional study examined 360 maxillary anterior teeth from 60 patients. GT was assessed using transgingival probing with an endodontic spreader. KGW, CR, and PH were measured using an IOS. One-way analysis of variance, the Student's
resultsHigher GT was significantly associated with thinner KGW in the central region (
conclusionsA moderate negative correlation was found between GT and KGW, as well as between PH and KGW in central teeth. In contrast, a weak negative correlation existed between CR and KGW. The PH (2.99 mm) was lower in lateral teeth than in canines. The traditional paradigm, which suggests a positive correlation between KGW and GT, was re-evaluated by measuring KGW using an IOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.