ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2023
Assessing informative tract segmentation and nTMS for pre-operative planning.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence models in the surgical planning of low-grade gliomas: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Driven Innovations in Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery: Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) in Neurosurgery: Unexplored Path Towards Personalized Brain Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Diffusion MRI with Machine Learning.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning-based (DL) methods are the best-performing methods for white matter tract segmentation in anatomically healthy subjects. However, tract annotations are variable or absent in clinical data and manual annotations are especially difficult in patients with tumors where normal anatomy may be distorted. Direct cortical and subcortical stimulation is the gold standard ground truth to determine the cortical and sub-cortical lo- cation of motor-eloquent areas intra-operatively. Nonetheless, this technique is invasive, prolongs the surgical procedure, and may cause patient fatigue. Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (nTMS) has a well-established correlation to direct cortical stimulation for motor mapping and the added advantage of being able to be acquired pre-operatively. NEW
methodIn this work, we evaluate the feasibility of using nTMS motor responses as a method to assess corticospinal tract (CST) binary masks and estimated uncertainty generated by a DL-based tract segmentation in patients with diffuse gliomas.
resultsOur results show CST binary masks have a high overlap coefficient (OC) with nTMS response masks. A strong negative correlation is found between estimated uncertainty and nTMS response mask distance to the CST binary mask. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsWe compare our approach (UncSeg) with the state-of-the-art TractSeg in terms of OC between the CST binary masks and nTMS response masks.
conclusionsIn this study, we demonstrate that estimated uncertainty from UncSeg is a good measure of the agreement between the CST binary masks and nTMS response masks distance to the CST binary mask boundary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.