Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523916›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2023

Discriminating cocaine use from other sympathomimetics using wearable electrocardiographic (ECG) sensors.

Gustavo A Angarita, Brian Pittman, Annamalai Nararajan, Talia F Mayerson, Abhinav Parate, Benjamin Marlin, Ralitza R Gueorguieva, Marc N Potenza, Deepak Ganesan, Robert T Malison

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo A AngaritaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA. Electronic address: Gustavo.angarita@yale.edu.
Brian PittmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Annamalai NararajanPhilips Research North America, Cambridge, MA02141, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Talia F MayersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Abhinav ParateManning College of Information and Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Lumme Health Inc, Boston, MA02210, USA.
Benjamin MarlinManning College of Information and Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Ralitza R GueorguievaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, Wethersfield, CT06109, USA; Wu Tsai Institute, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Deepak GanesanManning College of Information and Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA01003, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Robert T MalisonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Clinical Neuroscience Research Unit, Connecticut Mental Health Center, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT06519, USA; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT06510, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT06510, USA.
Yale University · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Validation of a Remote Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) Approach to the IndividualizR01DA033733 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GANESAN, DEEPAK, MALISON, ROBERT T · 2012 to 2013
$780k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur group has established the feasibility of using on-body electrocardiographic (ECG) sensors to detect cocaine use in the human laboratory. The purpose of the current study was to test whether ECG sensors and features are capable of discriminating cocaine use from other non-cocaine sympathomimetics.

methodsEleven subjects with cocaine use disorder wore the Zephyr BioHarness™ 3 chest band under six experimental (drug and non-drug) conditions, including 1) laboratory, intravenous cocaine self-administration, 2) after a single oral dose of methylphenidate, 3) during aerobic exercise, 4) during tobacco use (N=7 who smoked tobacco), and 5) during routine activities of daily inpatient living (unit activity). Three ECG-derived feature sets served as primary outcome measures, including 1) the RR interval (i.e., heart rate), 2) a group of ECG interval proxies (i.e., PR, QS, QT and QTc intervals), and 3) the full ECG waveform. Discriminatory power between cocaine and non-cocaine conditions for each of the three outcomes measures was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve.

resultsAll three outcomes successfully discriminated cocaine use from unit activity, exercise, tobacco, and methylphenidate conditions with a mean AUROC values ranging from 0.66 to 0.99 and with least squares means values all statistically different/higher than 0.5 among all subjects [F(3, 99) = 3.38, p =0.02] and among those with tobacco use [F(4, 84) = 5.39, p = 0.0007].

conclusionsThese preliminary results support discriminatory power of wearable ECG sensors for detecting cocaine use.

Indexed as

CocaineCocaine-Related DisordersMethylphenidateWearable Electronic DevicesElectrocardiographyHumansSympathomimeticsCocaineMethylphenidateSympathomimeticsAddictive behaviorsCocaine detectionCocaine use disorderElectrocardiographyExerciseMethylphenidateRemote wireless sensorsSubstance-related disordersTobacco

Identifiers

PMID37523916
PMCPMC10905422
OpenAlexW4384157387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.