ArticleACS synthetic biology2023
Guidelines for Optimizing Type S Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases.
Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generative AI designs functional thiolation domains for reprogramming non-ribosomal peptide synthetases.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Potential of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Engineering for Creating New Antimicrobial Complexes.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- High-Throughput Engineering and Modification of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetases Based on Golden Gate Assembly.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Structural Basis for a Scaffolding Role of the COM Domain in Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetases.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025Article
- Guidelines for High-Throughput Engineering of Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase Libraries.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial biosynthetic assembly lines, such as nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) and polyketide synthases (PKSs), play a crucial role in the synthesis of natural products that have significant therapeutic potential. The ability to engineer these biosynthetic assembly lines offers opportunities to produce artificial nonribosomal peptides, polyketides, and their hybrids with improved properties. In this study, we introduced a synthetic NRPS variant, termed type S NRPS, which simplifies the engineering process and enables biocombinatorial approaches for generating nonribosomal peptide libraries in a parallelized high-throughput manner. However, initial generations of type S NRPSs exhibited a bottleneck that led to significantly reduced production yields. To address this challenge, we employed two optimization strategies. First, we truncated SYNZIPs from the N- and/or C-terminus of the NRPS. SYNZIPs comprise a large set of well-characterized synthetic protein interaction reagents. Second, we incorporated a structurally flexible glycine-serine linker between the NRPS protein and the attached SYNZIP, aiming to improve dynamic domain-domain interactions. Through an iterative optimization process, we achieved remarkable improvements in production yields, with titer increases of up to 55-fold compared to the nonoptimized counterparts. These optimizations successfully restored production levels of type S NRPSs to those observed in wild-type NRPSs and even surpassed them. Overall, our findings demonstrate the potential of engineering bacterial biosynthetic assembly lines for the production of artificial nonribosomal peptides. In addition, optimizing the SYNZIP toolbox can have valuable implications for diverse applications in synthetic biology, such as metabolic engineering, cell signaling studies, or engineering of other multienzyme complexes, such as PKSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.