Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523751›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2023

Influence of prior authorization requirements on provider clinical decision-making.

Stephen G Salzbrenner, Maxwell Lydiatt, Brandon Helding, Lawrence M Scheier, Harrison Greene, Patricia Wonch Hill, Carrie McAdam-Marx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. An Overview of the Challenging Process of Prior Authorization: Medical Necessity for a Better Way.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephen G SalzbrennerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985578 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5578. Email: Stephen.salzbrenner@unmc.edu.
Maxwell Lydiatt
Brandon Helding
Lawrence M Scheier
Harrison Greene
Patricia Wonch Hill
Carrie McAdam-Marx

Funding

An Economical Point-of-Care Software Solution Prototype for Medication Prior AuthorizationR41MH124600 · NIMH · BREEZMED, LLC · PI SALZBRENNER, STEPHEN · 2020 to 2021
$353k
NIMH NIH HHS R41 MH124600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPrior authorization (PA) aims to promote the safe and effective use of medications and to control costs. However, PA-related administrative tasks can contribute to burden on health care providers. This study examines how such tasks affect treatment decisions. STUDY

designCross-sectional, online survey.

methodsWe conducted an online survey of US medical providers in 2020 based on a convenience sample of 100,000 providers. Multivariate path analysis was used to examine associations among provider practice characteristics, step therapy and other health plan requirements, perceived burdens of PA, communication issues with insurers, and prescribing behaviors (prescribing a different medication than planned, avoiding prescribing of newer medications even if evidence-based guideline recommendations are met, and modifying a diagnosis). Weighted analyses were conducted to assess nonresponse bias.

resultsA total of 1173 respondents (1.2% response rate) provided 1147 usable surveys. Step therapy requirements had the largest effect on clinical decision-making. Other significant effects on clinical decision-making included perceived PA likelihood, communication issues, and health plan requirements (eg, clinical documentation). Weighted analyses showed that the study conclusions were unlikely to have been biased by nonresponse.

conclusionsRespondents report that they may alter clinical decisions to avoid PA requirements and related burdens, even in cases in which use of the PA medication was clinically appropriate. Processes that reduce the administrative burden of PA through improved communication and transparency as well as standardized documentation may help ensure that PA more seamlessly achieves its goals of safe and effective use of medications.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingPrior AuthorizationCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID37523751
PMCPMC10403277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.