Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523374›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Towards a Swiss health study with human biomonitoring: Learnings from the pilot phase about participation and design.

Réjane Morand Bourqui, Semira Gonseth Nusslé, Natalie von Goetz, Caroline Veys-Takeuchi, Claire Zuppinger, Yoanne Boulez, Nolwenn Bühler, Laurence Chapatte, Christine Currat, Aline Dousse and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Réjane Morand BourquiHealth Protection Directorate, Federal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland.
Semira Gonseth NussléGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Natalie von GoetzHealth Protection Directorate, Federal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5257-4573
Caroline Veys-TakeuchiGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claire ZuppingerGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Yoanne BoulezGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nolwenn BühlerInstitute of Social Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2941-8032
Laurence ChapatteSwiss Biobanking Platform, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Christine CurratSwiss Biobanking Platform, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Aline DousseSwiss Biobanking Platform, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Vincent FaivreGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Oscar H FrancoInstitute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Julien VirziSwiss Biobanking Platform, Epalinges, Switzerland.
Martine Bourqui-PittetHealth Protection Directorate, Federal Office of Public Health, Bern, Switzerland.
Murielle BochudGeneral Direction, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, Unisanté, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large-scale national cohort aiming at investigating the health status and determinants in the general population is essential for high-quality public health research and regulatory decision-making. We present the protocol and first results of the pilot phase to a Swiss national cohort aiming at establishing the study procedures, evaluating feasibility, and assessing participation and willingness to participate.

methodsThe pilot phase 2020/21 included 3 components recruited via different channels: a population-based cross-sectional study targeting the adult population (20-69 years) of the Vaud and Bern cantons via personal invitation, a sub-study on selenium in a convenience sample of vegans and vegetarians via non-personal invitation in vegan/vegetarian networks, and a self-selected sample via news promotion (restricted protocol). Along with a participatory approach and participation, we tested the study procedures including online questionnaires, onsite health examination, food intake, physical activity assessments and biosample collection following high-quality standards.

resultsThe population-based study and the selenium sub-study had 638 (participation rate: 14%) and 109 participants, respectively, both with an over-representation of women. Of altogether 1349 recruited participants over 90% expressed interest in participating to a national health study, over 75% to contribute to medicine progress and help improving others' health, whereas about one third expressed concerns over data protection and data misuse.

conclusionsPublicly accessible high-quality public health data and human biomonitoring samples were collected. There is high interest of the general population in taking part in a national cohort on health. Challenges reside in achieving a higher participation rate and external validity. For project management clear governance is key.

Indexed as

Biological MonitoringSeleniumAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansSwitzerlandVegetariansSelenium

Identifiers

PMID37523374
PMCPMC10389725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.