Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523347›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2023

Deciphering peanut complex genomes paves a way to understand its origin and domestication.

Yuxin Pan, Yuhui Zhuang, Tao Liu, Hua Chen, Lihui Wang, Rajeev K Varshney, Weijian Zhuang, Xiyin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analysis of theCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Chromosomal variations and evolution in Arachis species revealed by single-copy FISH karyotyping.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuxin Pan *Center for Genomics and Computational Biology, College of Life Science, and College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8093-9701
Yuhui Zhuang *Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Tao LiuCenter for Genomics and Computational Biology, College of Life Science, and College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Hua ChenFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Lihui WangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Rajeev K VarshneyState Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, and Centre for Crop & Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, West Australia, Australia.
Weijian ZhuangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular and Cell Biology, Oil Crops Research Institute, State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1340-5723
Xiyin WangCenter for Genomics and Computational Biology, College of Life Science, and College of Science, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei, China.
Oil Crops Research Institute · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNMurdoch University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peanut (Arachis) is a key oil and protein crop worldwide with large genome. The genomes of diploid and tetraploid peanuts have been sequenced, which were compared to decipher their genome structures, evolutionary, and life secrets. Genome sequencing efforts showed that different cultivars, although Bt homeologs being more privileged in gene retention and gene expression. This subgenome bias, extended to sequence variation and point mutation, might be related to the long terminal repeat (LTR) explosions after tetraploidization, especially in At subgenomes. Except that, whole-genome sequences revealed many important genes, for example, fatty acids and triacylglycerols pathway, NBS-LRR (nucleotide-binding site-leucine-rich repeats), and seed size decision genes, were enriched after recursive polyploidization. Each ancestral polyploidy, with old ones having occurred hundreds of thousand years ago, has thousands of duplicated genes in extant genomes, contributing to genetic novelty. Notably, although full genome sequences are available, the actual At subgenome ancestor has still been elusive, highlighted with new debate about peanut origin. Although being an orphan crop lagging behind other crops in genomic resources, the genome sequencing achievement has laid a solid foundation for advancing crop enhancement and system biology research of peanut.

Indexed as

ArachisGenome, PlantBiological EvolutionChromosome MappingDomesticationPolyploidygene conversiongenomehomeologpeanuttransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID37523347
PMCPMC10579718
OpenAlexW4385415439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.