Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523346›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Prioritization of surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia care in India over seven decades: A systematic analysis of policy documents.

Ritika Shetty, Siddhesh Zadey, Anushka Jindal, Himanshu Iyer, Sweta Dubey, Gnanaraj Jesudian, Emily R Smith, Catherine A Staton, Tamara N Fitzgerald, Joao Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ritika ShettyAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Siddhesh ZadeyAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1176-1529
Anushka JindalAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Himanshu IyerAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-5461
Sweta DubeyAssociation for Socially Applicable Research (ASAR), Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Gnanaraj JesudianDepartment of EIE, Karunya University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-5892
Emily R SmithDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Catherine A StatonDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Tamara N FitzgeraldDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2208-4017
Joao Ricardo Nickenig VissociDepartment of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving access to surgical care in India requires policy-level prioritization of surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia (SOTA) care. We quantified SOTA care prioritization in the last seven decades by analyzing India's national policy and programmatic documents. Forty documents of national importance over seven decades (1946-2017) were screened for a set of 52 surgical and 6 non-surgical keywords. The number of mentions per keyword was used as a proxy for surgical prioritization. For thematic analysis, surgical mentions were further classified into five domains: Infrastructure, Workforce, Service Delivery, Financing, and Information Management. The total number of mentions was 4681 for the surgical keywords and 2322 for non-surgical. The number of mentions per keyword was 90.02 for surgical keywords and 387 for non-surgical. The older committee reports showed relatively higher SOTA care prioritization compared to the years after 2010. Among the domains, Service Delivery (897) had the maximum number of mentions followed by Infrastructure (545), Workforce (516), Financing (98), and Information Management (40). National Health Policy 2017, the most recent high-level policy, grossly neglected SOTA care. SOTA care is inadequately prioritized in Indian national health policies, especially in the documents after 2010. Concerted efforts are necessary to improve the focus on financing and information management. Prioritization can be improved through a stand-alone national plan for SOTA care along with integration into existing policies.

Identifiers

PMID37523346
PMCPMC10389714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.