Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523268›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Respiratory signal estimation for cardiac perfusion SPECT using deep learning.

Yuan Chen, P Hendrik Pretorius, Clifford Lindsay, Yongyi Yang, Michael A King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
P Hendrik PretoriusDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Clifford LindsayDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Yongyi YangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Michael A KingDepartment of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Optimization of diagnostic accuracy, radiation dose, and patient throughput for cardiac SPECT via advanced and clinically practical cardiac-respiratory motion correction and deep learningR01HL154687 · NHLBI · ILLINOIS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KING, MICHAEL A, YANG, YONGYI · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health R01HL154687NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL154687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRespiratory motion induces artifacts in reconstructed cardiac perfusion SPECT images. Correction for respiratory motion often relies on a respiratory signal describing the heart displacements during breathing. However, using external tracking devices to estimate respiratory signals can add cost and operational complications in a clinical setting. PURPOSE: We aim to develop a deep learning (DL) approach that uses only SPECT projection data for respiratory signal estimation.

methodsA modified U-Net was implemented that takes temporally finely sampled SPECT sub-projection data (100 ms) as input. These sub-projections are obtained by reframing the 20-s list-mode data, resulting in 200 sub-projections, at each projection angle for each SPECT camera head. The network outputs a 200-time-point motion signal for each projection angle, which was later aggregated over all angles to give a full respiratory signal. The target signal for DL model training was from an external stereo-camera visual tracking system (VTS). In addition to comparing DL and VTS, we also included a data-driven approach based on the center-of-mass (CoM) strategy. This CoM method estimates respiratory signals by monitoring the axial changes of CoM for counts in the heart region of the sub-projections. We utilized 900 subjects with stress cardiac perfusion SPECT studies, with 302 subjects for testing and the remaining 598 subjects for training and validation.

resultsThe Pearson's correlation coefficient between the DL respiratory signal and the reference VTS signal was 0.90, compared to 0.70 between the CoM signal and the reference. For respiratory motion correction on SPECT images, all VTS, DL, and CoM approaches partially de-blured the heart wall, resulting in a thinner wall thickness and increased recovered maximal image intensity within the wall, with VTS reducing blurring the most followed by the DL approach. Uptake quantification for the combined anterior and inferior segments of polar maps showed a mean absolute difference from the reference VTS of 1.7% for the DL method for patients with motion >12 mm, compared to 2.6% for the CoM method and 8.5% for no correction.

conclusionWe demonstrate the capability of a DL approach to estimate respiratory signal from SPECT projection data for cardiac perfusion imaging. Our results show that the DL based respiratory motion correction reduces artefacts and achieves similar regional quantification to that obtained using the stereo-camera VTS signals. This may enable fully automatic data-driven respiratory motion correction without relying on external motion tracking devices.

Indexed as

Deep LearningArtifactsHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMotionPerfusionPhantoms, ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photoncardiac SPECTdeep learningrespiratory signal

Identifiers

PMID37523268
PMCPMC11380461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.