Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37523218›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Generating variability from motor primitives during infant locomotor development.

Elodie Hinnekens, Marianne Barbu-Roth, Manh-Cuong Do, Bastien Berret, Caroline Teulier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elodie HinnekensUniversité Paris-Saclay, CIAMS, Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0649-0779
Marianne Barbu-RothUniversité de Paris, CNRS, Integrative Neuroscience and Cognition Center, Paris, France.
Manh-Cuong DoUniversité Paris-Saclay, CIAMS, Orsay, France.
Bastien Berret *Université Paris-Saclay, CIAMS, Orsay, France.
Caroline Teulier *Université Paris-Saclay, CIAMS, Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4400-783X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor variability is a fundamental feature of developing systems allowing motor exploration and learning. In human infants, leg movements involve a small number of basic coordination patterns called locomotor primitives, but whether and when motor variability could emerge from these primitives remains unknown. Here we longitudinally followed 18 infants on 2-3 time points between birth (~4 days old) and walking onset (~14 months old) and recorded the activity of their leg muscles during locomotor or rhythmic movements. Using unsupervised machine learning, we show that the structure of trial-to-trial variability changes during early development. In the neonatal period, infants own a minimal number of motor primitives but generate a maximal motor variability across trials thanks to variable activations of these primitives. A few months later, toddlers generate significantly less variability despite the existence of more primitives due to more regularity within their activation. These results suggest that human neonates initiate motor exploration as soon as birth by variably activating a few basic locomotor primitives that later fraction and become more consistently activated by the motor system.

Indexed as

MovementParturitionFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyUnsupervised Machine LearningWalkinghumaninfancylocomotor developmentmodularitymotor primitivesmuscle synergiesneurosciencetrial-to-trial variability

Identifiers

PMID37523218
PMCPMC10390046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.